Skip to main content

Table 1 Utility values for model patient’s outcomes and health state probabilities in the model

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of olanzapine in four-drug antiemetic therapy in Japanese patients treated with highly emetogenic cisplatin-containing chemotherapy

Parameters

Base case

(Range for one-way sensitivity analysis)

Distribution type for PSA

Reference

Utility weight

Complete control

0.827 (0.816 ~ 0.837)

Beta (Mean = 0.827, SE = 0.006)

[22]

Incomplete control

0.605 (0.454 ~ 0.756)

Beta (Mean = 0.222, SE = 0.077)

[22]

Disutility due to drowsiness

0.090 (0.050 ~ 0.120)

Beta (Mean = 0.090, SE = 20% of base case)

[23]

Probabilities

Complete control in acute phase in olanzapine regimen

0.941 (0.911 ~ 0.963)

Beta (α = 333, ß = 21)

[8]

Complete control in acute phase in non-olanzapine regimen

0.880 (0.842 ~ 0.912)

Beta (α = 309, ß = 42)

[8]

Complete control in delayed phase in olanzapine regimen

0.780 (0.733 ~ 0.822)

Beta (α = 276, ß = 78)

[8]

Complete control in delayed phase in non-olanzapine regimen

0.635 (0.583 ~ 0.686)

Beta (α = 223, ß = 128)

[8]

Drowsiness in olanzapine regimen

0.430 (0.380 ~ 0.480)

Beta (α = 153, ß = 202)

[8]

Drowsiness in non-olanzapine regimen

0.330 (0.280 ~ 0.380)

Beta (α = 116, ß = 235)

[8]

  1. PSA Probabilistic sensitivity analysis