Skip to main content

Table 4 Pharmacists affiliated with large or small- and medium-sized hospitals (Stratified analysis)

From: Analysis of factors affecting pharmacists' ability to identify and solve problems

 

Affiliated with large hospitals

   

Affiliated with small- and medium-sized hospitals

   

Group with experience presenting at academic conferences (N = 85)

Group without experience presenting at academic conferences (N = 40)

   

Group with experience presenting at academic conferences (N = 67)

Group without experience presenting at academic conferences (N = 108)

   

N

%

N

%

OR

95%CI

P value

N

%

N

%

OR

95%CI

P value

Respondent attributes

 Sex (male)

51

60.0

12

30.0

4.8

1.5–15.4

0.008a

30

44.8

38

35.2

1.4

0.5–3.9

0.49

 Age 20 s

10

11.8

12

30.0

Ref

 -

 -

5

7.5

20

18.5

Ref

  -

 -

   30 s

46

54.1

19

47.5

1.8

0.5–6.7

0.38

29

43.3

41

38.0

4.4

1.1–16.9

0.03a

   40 s

15

17.6

5

12.5

0.7

0.1–4.7

0.75

17

25.4

23

21.3

6.2

1.3–28.9

0.02a

   50 s

13

15.3

3

7.5

1.1

0.1–8.7

0.96

12

17.9

19

17.6

9.3

1.6–52.5

0.01a

   60 s

1

1.2

1

2.5

0.6

0–16.5

0.75

4

6.0

5

4.6

6.5

0.7–57.4

0.09

 Highest educational background (doctoral or master's degree)

21

24.7

4

10.0

2.3

0.5–10.2

0.28

13

19.4

8

7.4

2.2

0.6–7.8

0.24

Experiences gained in pharmacy school

 Experience presenting at academic conferences during pharmacy school

34

40.0

13

32.5

1.0

0.3–3.1

0.95

18

26.9

17

15.7

1.3

0.4–3.7

0.66

 Meeting a role model

35

41.2

17

42.5

1.5

0.5–4.1

0.47

29

43.3

28

25.9

3.2

1.2–8.3

0.02a

Physical environmental factors at your facility

 More than 16 full-time pharmacists

72

84.7

31

77.5

1.0

0.3–4.0

0.96

31

46.3

23

21.3

3.5

1.2–10.4

0.02a

 Frequency of information exchange is more than once/week

63

74.1

29

72.5

0.6

0.2–1.8

0.34

54

80.6

66

61.1

2.1

0.9–5.2

0.10

 Subsidy system

48

56.5

21

52.5

0.6

0.2–1.7

0.36

33

49.3

35

32.4

1.6

0.7–3.5

0.28

 Opportunities to report learning

57

67.1

19

47.5

1.9

0.6–6.1

0.25

38

56.7

32

29.6

1.4

0.6–3.2

0.41

Human environmental factors at your facility

 Presence of a pharmacist to consult

71

83.5

31

77.5

1.3

0.4–4.6

0.70

48

71.6

30

27.8

2.5

1.0–6.0

0.04a

 Experience in supervising interns

72

84.7

24

60.0

1.9

0.6–5.8

0.28

42

62.7

31

28.7

1.7

0.7–4.5

0.24

The status of self-learning /self-improvement motivation after employment

 Number of types of self-improvement (quartile range)

   4(3–6)

   3(2–4)

1.6

1.2–2.2

0.002a

   3(2–4)

   2(1–3)

1.2

0.9–1.6

0.26

 Execution of self-improvement

64

75.3

23

57.5

0.7

0.2–2.1

0.52

40

59.7

28

25.9

1.2

0.4–3.2

0.75

 Assignment from your facility

37

43.5

14

35.0

1.0

0.4–2.9

0.97

25

37.3

23

21.3

1.1

0.5–2.8

0.78

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. aSignificant at P < 0.05