Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the factor analysis for the community pharmacy practice

From: Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program

Question

FA1

FA2

FA3

FA4

(1) I am satisfied because I was able to learn what would be useful for my career as a pharmacist.

0.87

-0.11

-0.03

-0.05

(2) I was able to experience the overall work of a pharmacist sufficiently.

0.75

-0.10

0.01

0.05

(3) The pharmacists facilitated your appropriate self-learning so that you can solve the problems of the patients.

0.71

0.10

-0.02

0.03

(4) The pharmacists asked you related questions so that you can improve your ability to create an effective treatment plan.

0.69

0.09

0.00

0.01

(5) I felt that I had too many tasks that would not lead to learning for me as a trainee.

-0.67

0.03

0.05

0.03

(6) The pharmacists were able to have an empathetic communication with you.

0.66

-0.07

-0.04

0.14

(7) The pharmacists accepted you as a member of the team.

0.64

0.02

-0.07

0.07

(8) Some learning contents were far from pharmacist’s work.

-0.62

0.10

0.09

0.02

(9) The actual learning contents were in line with the learning objectives (SBOs).

0.53

-0.03

0.32

-0.03

(10) I was able to experience “Community-Based Care” at the community pharmacy sufficiently.

0.46

-0.01

0.05

0.08

(11) Safety precautions (medicine shelf arrangements, checking empty bags after mixed injection, etc.) were taken for medicine and injected drug preparation in general.

0.45

-0.04

0.13

-0.04

(12) The practical training contents were well matched with the pre-practice training.

0.35

0.30

-0.04

-0.13

(13) The university teachers gave you enough feedback on your learnings at the training site.

-0.15

0.91

0.01

0.06

(14) The university teachers provided enough support for me so that I can prevent trouble, or work on the practical training smoothly in case of trouble.

-0.06

0.84

0.02

0.04

(15) The practical training contents were well matched with the classes from the 1st to the 4th years (excluding the pre-practice training).

0.26

0.38

-0.04

-0.12

(16) Training schedule by day was prepared and informed to me in advance.

-0.03

0.01

0.91

-0.01

(17) Training schedule by hour was prepared and informed to me in advance.

0.00

0.03

0.80

0.01

(18) I was able to have enough time with patients to explain about drugs or disease.

0.13

0.03

-0.02

0.83

(19) I was able to have enough time with patients to talk with them.

0.06

0.07

0.02

0.80

Inter-factor correlations

    

FA1

 

0.46

0.49

0.50

FA2

  

0.18

0.19

FA3

   

0.24

Cronbach's alpha

0.74

0.75

0.70

0.72

  1. The factors were defined as the following: the first factor (FA1) was “satisfactory learning (pharmacy)”; the second factor (FA2) was the “support system of the university”; the third factor (FA3) was the “creation and clarification of the training plan”; and the fourth factor (FA4) was “dialogue with patients”