Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between the group with venous irritation and the group without venous irritation

From: Risk factors for venous irritation in patients receiving vinorelbine: a retrospective study

Variable

Group with venous irritation (n = 24)

Group without venous irritation (n = 39)

p-value

Age, years

Median (range)

64 (35–73)

65 (39–84)

0.514b

Sex (%)

Male

14 (58.3)

27 (69.2)

0.423c

Female

10 (41.7)

12 (30.8)

Body surface area, m2

Mean ± SD

1.60 a ± 0.14

1.68 a ± 0.16

0.035d

Body mass index, n (%)

≥ 25

3 (12.5)

9 (23.1)

0.345c

<  25

21 (87.5)

30 (76.9)

Regimen (%)

Single

4 (16.7)

8 (20.5)

1c

Combination

20 (83.3)

31 (79.5)

CDDP administration

Yes

18 (75.0)

27 (69.2)

0.776c

No

6 (25.0)

12 (30.8)

Department (%)

Respiratory medicine

7 (29.2)

19 (48.7)

0.188c

Surgery

17 (70.8)

20 (51.3)

VNR dose, mg (%)

≥ 40

6 (25.0)

15 (38.5)

0.410c

<  40

18 (75.0)

24 (61.5)

Route of administration (%)

Side port

6 (25.0)

13 (33.3)

0.578c

Main route

18 (75.0)

26 (66.7)

Drug formulation (%)

Branded

18 (75.0)

34 (87.2)

0.307c

Generic

6 (25.0)

5 (12.8)

History of diabetes mellitus (%)

Yes

4 (16.7)

6 (15.4)

1c

No

20 (83.3)

33 (84.6)

Dexamethasone premedication dose, mg

Mean ± SD

10.86 ± 3.00

10.92 ± 3.04

0.946 d

Hot compress with hot towel (%)

Yes

8 (33.3)

6 (15.4)

0.124 c

No

16 (66.7)

33 (84.6)

  1. CDDP cisplatin, VNR vinorelbine. aDu Bois formula, bMann–Whitney U test, cFisher’s exact test, dStudent’s t-test