Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy, decisional conflicts, and health-related quality of life among treatment-naïve individuals living with HIV: a DEARS-J observational study

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences volume 9, Article number: 9 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Supporting people living with HIV using anti-retroviral therapy (ART) is important due to the requirement for strict medication adherence. To date, no data from longitudinal studies evaluating adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV are currently available. We investigated the adherence of treatment-naïve people living with HIV over time and examined the relationships among decisional conflicts, adherence, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

Methods

The survey items included adherence (visual analogue scale [VAS]), decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale [DCS]), and HRQL (Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey [MOS-HIV]). The DCS and MOS-HIV scores and the VAS and MOS scores were collected electronically at the ART initiation time point and at 4-, 24-, and 48-week post-treatment time points.

Results

A total of 215 participants were enrolled. The mean DCS score was 27.3 (SD, 0.9); 23.3% of participants were in the high-score and 36.7% in the low-score groups. The mean adherence rates at 4, 24, and 48 weeks were 99.2% (standard error [SE], 0.2), 98.4% (SE, 0.4), and 96.0% (SE, 1.2), respectively. The least-square means of the MOS-HIV for the DCS (high vs. low scores) were 64.4 vs. 69.2 for general health perceptions and 57.7 vs. 64.0 for HRQL, respectively.

Conclusion

Adherence among treatment-naïve people living with HIV was maintained at a higher level, and HRQL tended to improve with ART. People with high levels of decisional conflict tended to have lower HRQL scores. Support for people living with HIV during ART initiation may be related to HRQL.

Background

Anti-retroviral therapy (ART) improves the prognosis for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [1], but it requires long-term treatment and the maintenance of strict adherence to treatment. To achieve treatment success, 95% adherence is required for early ART [2]; however, recent studies have reported treatment success rates of 98.9% and 96% with adherence rates of 90% or more and 80–90%, respectively [3]. In a meta-analysis of people living with HIV who are 12 to 24 years of age, 50–60% in Western countries and more than 70% in Asia reported good adherence [4]. Although advances in ART have improved treatment success rates, adherence remains important to achieving the best outcomes [5]. Therefore, treatment-naïve people living with HIV experience high levels of decisional conflict and anxiety caused by medical uncertainties at the start of treatment [6]. Negative attitudes toward treatment and low literacy levels [7, 8] are factors associated with non-adherence; however, good communication with healthcare professionals [8, 9] is associated with good adherence. Some reports have suggested that decisional conflict can be reduced with support from healthcare professionals [10], but this has not been confirmed [11]. However, people living with HIV have a poorer health-related quality of life (HRQL) than the general population [12]. Previous studies have reported that ART improves the HRQL and that good adherence is associated with good HRQL [13].

To date, no data from longitudinal studies evaluating adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV have been obtained. We hypothesized that adherence to ART by treatment-naïve people living with HIV would be associated with decisional conflict, with decreased decisional conflict leading to increased adherence and better HRQL.

This study assessed longitudinal adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV and analyzed relationships among adherence, decisional conflicts, and HRQL.

Methods

Study design and participants

This was a multicenter, observational study of treatment-naïve people living with HIV who newly initiated ART at eight medical institutions in Japan. The enrolment period was from 1 to 2017 to 31 March 2019. The eligibility criteria were age 20 years or older and treatment-naïve people living with HIV who had newly initiated ART. Participants with severe mental illness, cognitive impairment that might affect the completion of the questionnaire, and native speakers of a language other than Japanese were excluded.

Ethical consideration

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology and Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, 2014). The approval and supervision of the ethical review committee of each institution were obtained, and all participants provided informed consent. This study is registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) (number: 000030146).

Outcomes and measurements

Demographics

Participant characteristics, including age, sex, weight, history of hepatitis B virus, history of hepatitis C virus, AIDS, serum creatinine level, ART regimen, and virological outcome, were collected from the medical records. The following formula for the Japanese population was used to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m2): 194 × [age]−0.287 × [serum creatinine (mg/dL)]−1.094 × 0.739 (females).

Decisional conflict

Decisional conflict was assessed using the decisional conflict scale (DCS) [14]. The DCS consists of 16 items and uses a 5-point Likert scale. Scores were calculated using a scale of 0 to 100. According to the user manual, we calculated the total score and the scores for the following subscales: informed, values clarity, support, uncertainty, and effective decision [15]. Higher scores indicated a higher conflict state of the participants. A total score < 25 (low) was associated with easier decision-making, and a total score ≥ 37.5 (high) was associated with delayed or uncertain decision-making. The effect size for a clinically meaningful difference was estimated to range from 0.3 to 0.4.

Medication adherence

Medication adherence was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS has been used for clinical research and routine practice as a simple method of assessing medication adherence by people with HIV and has been associated with treatment effectiveness [16,17,18]. The VAS question was as follows: “What percentage of your medications did you take in the past month?” If the VAS score was not 100%, then a selective format was used to investigate why the dose was not administered.

Health-related quality of life

The HRQL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV), specifically for individuals with HIV [19]. The MOS-HIV is a 35-item questionnaire that assesses the following subscales: general health perceptions, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, energy/fatigue, mental health, health distress, cognitive function, quality of life, and health transition. The scales of the MOS-HIV are scored as summed rating scale scores using a scale of 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better health.

Virological outcomes

The HIV-1 viral load and CD4 counts were collected as virological outcomes. Virological success was defined as an HIV-1 viral load < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks, following the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm.

Data collection

At the time of ART initiation, DCS and MOS-HIV scores were collected. Adherence rates and MOS-HIV scores were collected at 4, 24, and 48 weeks after initiation. Patient-reported outcome instruments were administered by an electronic patient-reported outcome system (Viedoc Me; Pharma Consulting Group, Uppsala, Sweden). Depending on the WiFi environment, each site either chose to use the ‘bring your own device’ method or provided devices to collect electronic patient-reported outcomes. Researchers examined individual patient backgrounds at ART initiation and virological outcomes at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 weeks. Collected data were entered into the Electronic Data Capture system (Viedoc; Pharma Consulting Group).

Study cohorts and analysis

Baseline demographics of participants were summarized using descriptive analyses. The VAS scores for medication adherence and MOS-HIV scores were calculated as means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize reasons for not using medication. Longitudinal changes (weeks 4, 24, and 48) and these trends from baseline in the MOS-HIV scores across groups that were used to classify the DCS score level (high, normal, low) at ART initiation were estimated by constructing a general linear model that included the baseline MOS-HIV score, history of AIDS, CD4, and timepoint as explanatory variables (repeated measurements). An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed, and robust standard errors (SEs) were calculated as parameter estimates. All analyses were conducted using Statistical Analysis System (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Tests were two-sided, and the statistical significance level was 5%. No correction for multiple tests was performed.

Results

Participants

A total of 215 people living with HIV were recruited (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 37.2 years (standard deviation (SD), 9.8 years), and 96.7% were males. Furthermore, 57.7% had hepatitis B virus-seronegative, 2.8% had an active hepatitis C virus infection, and 10.7% had AIDS. Most were prescribed two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and one integrase strand transfer inhibitor; 80% were prescribed a dolutegravir-based regimen and 35% were prescribed single-tablet regimens. At baseline, the median HIV-RNA viral load was 62,400 copies/mL (interquartile range (IQR), 18,500–151,500), the median CD4 + cell count was 314 cells/µL (IQR, 133–455.5 cells/µL), and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 90.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 78.2–102.5 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Participant flow chart. ePRO, electric patient-reported outcome

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics (n = 215)
Full size table

Adherence and virological outcomes

Data were available at 4, 24, and 48 weeks for 207 (96.3%), 188 (87.4%), and 177 (82.3%) participants, respectively. The mean adherence rates at 4, 24, and 48 weeks were 99.2% (SE, 0.2%), 98.4% (SE, 0.4%), and 96.0% (SE, 1.2%), respectively. Adherence rates less than 100% were observed for 11.1%, 30.9%, and 28.3% of participants at 4, 24, and 48 weeks, respectively (Table 2). The reasons for missing ART doses at 48 weeks were as follows: “forgot” (68.0%); “pill not with participant” (18.0%); and “too busy to take them” (12.0%). The reason “slept through dose” was reported by 17.4% at 4 weeks; however, this rate decreased to 4.0% at 48 weeks. The virological outcome of virological success (HIV-RNA level < 50 copies/mL) was achieved by 180 (83.7%) at 48 weeks. However, 25 (11.6%) missed their tests because of time deviation or hospital transfer.

Table 2 Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy and reasons for missed medication
Full size table

Decisional conflict and HRQL

The mean DCS total score was 27.3 (SD, 13.5). Fifty (23.3%) participants had a score ≥ 37.5, 82 (38.1%) had a score of 25 to 37.5, and 79 (36.7%) had a score ≤ 25. Among the subscores, those for uncertainty, informed, values clarity, and effective decision were normal (range, 25–37.5), and those for support were low (19.6). The MOS-HIV scores at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 weeks are shown in Table 3. The mean MOS-HIV scores at 48 weeks were as follows: general health perceptions, 66.9 (SE, 1.4); pain, 66.3 (SE, 1.8); physical functioning, 94.3 (SE, 0.8); role functioning, 90.6 (SE, 2.0); social functioning, 90.7 (SE, 1.2); energy/fatigue, 46.1 (SE, 0.8); mental health, 72.2 (SE, 1.5); health distress, 76.0 (SE, 1.7); cognitive function, 78.2 (SE, 1.4); quality of life, 61.1 (SE, 1.5); and health transition, 61.1 (SE, 1.5). Overall, the MOS-HIV score tended to increase after ART. However, the energy/fatigue score remained unchanged, and the pain score increased at 4 and 24 weeks but was below baseline at 48 weeks.

Table 3 Changes in MOS-HIV subscale scores over time
Full size table

Relationships among adherence, decisional conflict, and HRQL

Because medication adherence was high, we could not examine the relationships between adherence and other factors, decisional conflict, and HRQL. The least squares mean of the longitudinal MOS-HIV subscores adjusted for the baseline MOS-HIV score, AIDS history, and CD4 counts, according to the DCS score level (high, normal, low) at ART initiation, are shown in Fig. 2. There was no interaction between DCS score level and timepoints. The results of the trend test showed a tendency for the group with higher DCS scores to have lower general health perception (p = 0.025) and quality of life (p = 0.018) and possibly, lower role functioning (p = 0.0512), social functioning (p = 0.081), and cognitive function (p = 0.086). The differences in the least squares means of the MOS-HIV subscores adjusted for baseline MOS-HIV score, AIDS history, and CD4 count according to the DCS score level (high, normal, low) at the timepoints of ART initiation are shown in Table 4. Regardless of the DCS score level, the general health perception increased from week 4 up to week 24 and week 48; on the other hand, the role functioning and energy/fatigue at all time points showed no differences regardless of the DCS score level. Regardless of the DCS score level, the pain at week 48 decreased compared to that in week 4 and week 24. The least squares mean of the longitudinal MOS-HIV subscores adjusted for baseline MOS-HIV score, AIDS history, CD4, and timepoints according to the DCS score level for the entire study period are shown in Table 5. The MOS-HIV subscores of the low and high DCS score groups differed significantly for general health perception (69.2 vs. 64.4; difference: -4.8; 95% CI: -9.0 to -6.2; p = 0.025) and quality of life (64.0 vs. 57.7; difference: -6.3; 95% CI: -11.5 to -1.1; p = 0.018). Similarly, there was a possibility of difference in social functioning (92.4 vs. 88.8; difference: -3.6; 95% CI: -7.7 to 0.4; p = 0.081) and cognitive function (79.0 vs. 75.3; difference: -3.7; 95% CI: -8.0 to 0.5; p = 0.086). Role functioning showed a significant difference between the low and normal DCS score groups (95.1 vs. 88.5; difference: -6.6; 95% CI: -13.0 to -0.3; p = 0.041) and a trend towards a difference between the low and high DCS score groups; however, this difference was not significant (95.1 vs. 88.7; difference: -6.4; 95% CI: -12.9 to 0.0; p = 0.051).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Longitudinal changes in MOS-HIV subscores according to the DCS score level (low, normal, high) after anti-retroviral therapy. MOS-HIV, Medical Outcomes Study Human Immunodeficiency Virus Health Survey; DCS, decisional conflict scale

Full size image
Table 4 MOS-HIV subscale score differences (LSM) by DCS score level at timepoints after antiretroviral therapy
Full size table
Table 5 MOS-HIV subscale scores according to the DCS score level after anti-retroviral therapy
Full size table

Discussion

This study investigated medication adherence by treatment-naïve people living with HIV and examined the decisional conflicts and HRQL that affect adherence. The mean level of adherence was maintained at a high level (> 95%). Decisional conflict ranged from low to high, and high conflicts tended to be associated with low HRQL.

A meta-analysis of adherence and virological failure suggested that even low adherence levels of 80–90% were sufficient for viral suppression; however, an adherence level of > 95% should be the target [5]. For treatment efficacy, the success of virological treatment, which was the most commonly used treatment by the participants in this study, after 48 weeks of a clinical study of dolutegravir (SPRING-2) was 88% [20]. In the present study, the mean adherence rate at the end of 48 weeks of ART was 96.0%, with 74.4% and 71.7% reporting adherence rates of ≥ 95% and 100%, respectively; the virological success rate was 83.7%. Treatment-naïve people living with HIV in Japan exhibited the high adherence required for viral suppression, and virological success was comparable to that reported by the SPRING-2 study. Virological success rates may have been underestimated because of factors such as missed time, hospital transfers, and study discontinuation. There have been no reports of the follow-up of subjective adherence and virological outcomes in Japan; therefore, this study provides new insights.

According to previous studies, factors associated with high adherence may include simple regimens (fewer doses, single-tablet regimens) [21,22,23,24], history of opportunistic diseases [25], and good communication with health care providers [8, 9]. However, factors associated with non-adherence may include low literacy levels [7, 8], medication side effects [26, 27], mental health issues such as depression [27,28,29,30], and stigma [31, 32]. Factors influencing adherence could not be tested because of the small sample size of non-adherent participants in the present study; however, it is considered that the simpler regimen contributed to good adherence. In Japan, multidisciplinary interventions are recommended to improve adherence. All facilities involved in this study were AIDS care hospitals providing multidisciplinary support systems for people living with HIV. However, the DCS support score was low. The reasons for missed doses—“forgot” and “too busy to take them”—were the same as those reported by a previous study [7] but “slept through dose” and “pill not with the participant” could have been prevented by the education provided. This suggests that the support system for people living with HIV needs to be further enhanced.

In a previous study, people living with HIV improved their HRQL with the early initiation of ART, even if they were asymptomatic at the start of treatment when adherence was good [19, 33]; however, it declined with side effects [34, 35]. Most of the MOS-HIV subscores in this study were improved at 4 weeks; however, at 24 and 48 weeks, they were almost equal and were considered to have reached a plateau. The improvement in HRQL may be attributed to the improvement in HIV-related symptoms with ART, minor side effects of ART, and good adherence. In a meta-analysis comparing ART-treated and non-treated groups, the impact of ART on the HRQL was limited, with diagnosis time and hospital services being significantly associated with improved HRQL [36]. Furthermore, people living with HIV are expected to experience significant changes in HRQL during long-term treatment [37]. Therefore, continuous support is necessary, and it may be useful to check adherence as an indicator of HRQL. Notably, there was no improvement in energy/fatigue or pain scores with ART in this study. HIV-related fatigue has been reported by 33–88% of patients and was highly associated with unemployment and inadequate income, ART, sleep disturbances, depression, and anxiety; however, no association between the CD4 count and HIV viral load was observed [38]. ART reportedly improves energy/fatigue [39], but the patient-reported HIV symptom index showed the appearance of fatigue [40]. People living with HIV are at higher risk for chronic pain, including musculoskeletal pain, painful neuropathy, and headaches. Chronic pain is also associated with cognitive impairment and mental health [41,42,43]. In this study, there was no improvement in energy/fatigue and pain despite improvements in physical functioning and mental health with ART. Factors such as unstudied ART adverse events, cognitive function, and stigma may have influenced the results. Validation using more specific measures of energy/fatigue and pain is warranted.

Decisional conflict experienced by cancer patients is correlated with the HRQL, and more knowledge of treatment and side effects is associated with improved HRQL after treatment [44, 45]. When the MOS-HIV subscores were adjusted for CD4 and a history of AIDS, the group with high decisional conflict had predominantly lower general health perceptions and quality of life subscores than the group with low decisional conflict. Although the HRQL of people living with HIV is influenced by the CD4 count and opportunistic infections [13, 46], it was more influenced by decisional conflict in the present study. Similar to cancer patients, decisional conflicts experienced by people living with HIV may be related to their HRQL. Because the DCS subscore for “informed” was normal, information about therapeutic drugs was provided; this might have contributed to the HRQL. In the low DCS group, role functioning tended to differ between the normal and high DCS scores. Role functioning indicates the influence of health status on work and school attendance and may be influenced by AIDS and CD4 counts. However, there are no reports demonstrating a relationship between role functioning and DCS; this is an important research topic for future studies. Multidisciplinary counseling is considered an effective approach to reducing decisional conflict [10]. Information and counseling provided by multidisciplinary professionals at the beginning of treatment may reduce decisional conflict and improve the HRQL.

The limitations of this study included selection bias and information bias. Selection bias is caused by factors influencing the individual’s decision regarding whether to participate in a study. This study was an observational study based on individual reports using electronic media. Some eligible patients did not agree to participate in the study because of their lack of continuous medical visits, severe cognitive impairment, or difficulty using electronic media. This indicates the possibility that participants with good adherence were selected for the study. The present study was conducted according to the hypothesis of “increased adherence and better HRQL leading to decreased decisional conflict.“ However, because of good adherence, this hypothesis could not be tested. The results of this study may be limited to the group with good adherence. Regarding information bias, this study may have over-reported adherence because it was a self-reported adherence survey conducted mainly by medical personnel. Self-report adherence surveys have been shown to have a tendency to overestimate results [47]. According to a web-based survey conducted by non-medical HIV researchers and parties in Japan, 56.4% of the respondents reported never forgetting to take their medications for a month [48]. This result deviates from that of the present study, and these biases may have occurred. Additionally, this study did not collect data regarding factors such as depression, psychiatric disorders, sexual behavior, or social stigma, which may be related to adherence and the HRQL. Therefore, these points should be considered when generalizing the results of the present study.

Conclusion

Adherence among people living with HIV was maintained at a high level, and ART tended to improve the HRQL. Additionally, participants with high levels of decisional conflict at the time of treatment initiation may have poorer HRQL for up to 48 weeks compared to those with low levels of decisional conflict. In other words, reducing conflict at treatment initiation may lead to improved HRQL. Therefore, it is important to enhance social support, such as nursing care and welfare by policymakers, support groups for people living with HIV, support from local communities, and medical support from multidisciplinary teams.

Availability of data and materials

Due to the nature of the study, participants did not agree to having their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is unavailable.

Abbreviations

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

AIDS:

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

ART:

Anti-retroviral therapy

HRQL:

Health-related quality of life

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

DCS:

Decisional conflict scale

MOS-HIV:

Medical outcomes study- HIV

References

  1. Murphy EL, Collier AC, Kalish LA, Assmann SF, Para MF, Flanigan TP, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy decreases mortality and morbidity in patients with advanced hiv disease. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:17–26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11434728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, Brester M, Vergis EN, Squier C, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with hiv infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:21–30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10877736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon LL, Gharibian D, Chong K, Chun H. Comparison of hiv virologic failure rates between patients with variable adherence to three antiretroviral regimen types. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29:384–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim SH, Gerver SM, Fidler S, Ward H. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in adolescents living with hiv: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014;28:1945–56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezabhe WM, Chalmers L, Bereznicki LR, Peterson GM. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and virologic failure: a meta-analysis. Med (Baltim). 2016;95:e3361. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27082595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kremer H, Ironson G, Schneiderman N, Hautzinger M. “It’s my body’’: does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:522–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nachega JB, Morroni C, Zuniga JM, Schechter M, Rockstroh J, Solomon S, et al. Hiv treatment adherence, patient health literacy, and health care provider-patient communication: results from the 2010 aids treatment for life international survey. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2012;11:128–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alfonso V, Toulson A, Bermbach N, Erskine Y, Montaner J. Psychosocial issues influencing treatment adherence in patients on multidrug rescue therapy: perspectives from patients and their health care providers. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23:119–26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19196034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bezreh T, Laws MB, Taubin T, Rifkin DE, Wilson IB. Challenges to physician-patient communication about medication use: a window into the skeptical patient’s world. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:11–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22272065.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawaguchi T, Sekine Y, Azuma K, Yamaguchi T, Soeda H, Takeuchi H, et al. Quantitative assessment of the effect of pharmacist counseling on decisional conflict analysis in the patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2013;39:689–99. https://doi.org/10.5649/jjphcs.39.689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stalmeier PF. Adherence and decision aids: a model and a narrative review. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:121–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20519453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miners AH, Sabin CA, Mocroft A, Youle M, Fisher M, Johnson M. Health-related quality of life in individuals infected with hiv in the era of haart. HIV Clin Trials. 2001;2:484–92. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11742437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen KK, Eiersted MR, Gaardbo JC, Pedersen M, Gerstoft J, Troseid M, et al. Lower self-reported quality of life in hiv-infected patients on cart and with low comorbidity compared with healthy controls. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;70:16–22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7898294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Decisional conflict scale - evaluation measures - patient decision aids -. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2020. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_dcs.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2022.

  16. Finitsis DJ, Pellowski JA, Huedo-Medina TB, Fox MC, Kalichman SC. Visual analogue scale (vas) measurement of antiretroviral adherence in people living with hiv (plwh): a meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2016;39:1043–55. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27481102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giordano TP, Guzman D, Clark R, Charlebois ED, Bangsberg DR. Measuring adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a diverse population using a visual analogue scale. HIV Clin Trials. 2004;5:74–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15116282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh JC, Dalton M, Gazzard BG. Adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy assessed by anonymous patient self-report. AIDS. 1998;12:2361–3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9863888.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruiz-Pérez I, Olry de Labry-Lima A, López-Ruz MA, del Arco-Jiménez A, Rodríguez-Baño J, Causse-Prados M, et al. [clinical status, adherence to haart and quality of life in hiv-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2005;23:581–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16324546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill AM, DeMasi R, Dawson D. Meta-analysis of antiretroviral effects on hiv-1 rna, cd4 cell count and progression to aids or death. Antivir Ther. 1998;3:139–45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10682131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Altice F, Evuarherhe O, Shina S, Carter G, Beaubrun AC. Adherence to hiv treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:475–90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Buscher A, Hartman C, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Impact of antiretroviral dosing frequency and pill burden on adherence among newly diagnosed, antiretroviral-naive hiv patients. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23:351–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22648890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clay PG, Nag S, Graham CM, Narayanan S. Meta-analysis of studies comparing single and multi-tablet fixed dose combination hiv treatment regimens. Med (Baltim). 2015;94:e1677. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26496277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connor JL, Gardner EM, Mannheimer SB, Lifson AR, Esser S, Telzak EE, et al. Factors associated with adherence amongst 5295 people receiving antiretroviral therapy as part of an international trial. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:40–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh N, Squier C, Sivek C, Wagener M, Nguyen MH, Yu VL. Determinants of compliance with antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: prospective assessment with implications for enhancing compliance. AIDS Care. 1996;8:261–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8827119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fogarty L, Roter D, Larson S, Burke J, Gillespie J, Levy R. Patient adherence to hiv medication regimens: a review of published and abstract reports. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:93–108. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11867239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiser S, Wolfe W, Bangsberg D, Thior I, Gilbert P, Makhema J, et al. Barriers to antiretroviral adherence for patients living with hiv infection and aids in botswana. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:281–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14600572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang Y, Li X, Cho H, Brown MJ, Qiao S, Haider MR. Effects of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on antiretroviral therapy adherence: the role of adherence self-efficacy. J Health Psychol. 2021;26:1143–53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31419916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pokhrel KN, Pokhrel KG, Sharma VD, Poudel KC, Neupane SR, Mlunde LB, et al. Mental health disorders and substance use among people living with hiv in nepal: their influence on non-adherence to anti-retroviral therapy. AIDS Care. 2019;31:923–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30835503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shubber Z, Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Vreeman R, Freitas M, Bock P, et al. Patient-reported barriers to adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rintamaki LS, Davis TC, Skripkauskas S, Bennett CL, Wolf MS. Social stigma concerns and hiv medication adherence. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20:359–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16706710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rao D, Kekwaletswe TC, Hosek S, Martinez J, Rodriguez F. Stigma and social barriers to medication adherence with urban youth living with hiv. AIDS Care. 2007;19:28–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mannheimer SB, Matts J, Telzak E, Chesney M, Child C, Wu AW, et al. Quality of life in hiv-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy is related to adherence. AIDS Care. 2005;17:10–22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15832830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lifson AR, Grund B, Gardner EM, Kaplan R, Denning E, Engen N, et al. Improved quality of life with immediate versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic hiv infection. AIDS. 2017;31:953–63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maiese EM, Johnson PT, Bancroft T, Goolsby Hunter A, Wu AW. Quality of life of hiv-infected patients who switch antiretroviral medication due to side effects or other reasons. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32:2039–46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghiasvand H, Waye KM, Noroozi M, Harouni GG, Armoon B, Bayani A. Clinical determinants associated with quality of life for people who live with hiv/aids: a meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:768. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Degroote S, Vogelaers D, Vandijck DM. What determines health-related quality of life among people living with hiv: an updated review of the literature. Archives of Public Health. 2014;72:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jong E, Oudhoff LA, Epskamp C, Wagener MN, van Duijn M, Fischer S, et al. Predictors and treatment strategies of hiv-related fatigue in the combined antiretroviral therapy era. AIDS. 2010;24:1387–405. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20523204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Grijsen M, Koster G, van Vonderen M, van Kasteren M, Kootstra G, Steingrover R, et al. Temporary antiretroviral treatment during primary hiv-1 infection has a positive impact on health-related quality of life: data from the primo-shm cohort study. HIV Med. 2012;13:630–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22533544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wohl D, Clarke A, Maggiolo F, Garner W, Laouri M, Martin H, et al. Patient-reported symptoms over 48 weeks among participants in randomized, double-blind, phase iii non-inferiority trials of adults with hiv on co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus co-formulated abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine. Patient. 2018;11:561–73. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Uebelacker LA, Weisberg RB, Herman DS, Bailey GL, Pinkston-Camp MM, Stein MD. Chronic pain in hiv-infected patients: relationship to depression, substance use, and mental health and pain treatment. Pain Med. 2015;16:1870–81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jiao JM, So E, Jebakumar J, George MC, Simpson DM, Robinson-Papp J. Chronic pain disorders in hiv primary care: clinical characteristics and association with healthcare utilization. Pain. 2016;157:931–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26683238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kemp HI, Kennedy DL, Vollert J, Davies NWS, Scott W, Rice ASC. Chronic pain and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study in people living with hiv. AIDS Care. 2021:1–14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33739206.

  44. Kates JM. Treatment-related decisional conflict, quality of life, and comorbidity in older adults with cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018;5:421–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30271826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Orom H, Biddle C, Underwood W, Nelson CJ, Homish DL. What is a “good” treatment decision? Decisional control, knowledge, treatment decision making, and quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2016;36:714–25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957566.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Basavaraj KH, Navya MA, Rashmi R. Quality of life in hiv/aids. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2010;31:75–80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stirratt MJ, Dunbar-Jacob J, Crane HM, Simoni JM, Czajkowski S, Hilliard ME, et al. Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5:470–82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Togari T, Inoue Y, Abe S, Hosokawa R, Takaku Y. Hiv-related health status, adherence, and stress coping capacity among men living with hiv in japan. HIV/AIDS Res Treat Open J. 2018;2:5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in this study. We also thank the following HIV medical teams at the collaborating institutions for their support of this study: Tokyo Medical University Hospital; Sapporo Medical University Hospital; AIDS Clinical Center; National Center for Global Health and Medicine; National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center; National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital; Gifu University Hospital; Hyogo Medical University Hospital; and Chiba University Hospital. Finally, we thank Hironori Takeuchi (Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital), and Sakae Unezaki (Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences) for their cooperation with the design and analysis of the study. We thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This study did not receive funding from any funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan

    Yusuke Sekine

  2. Department of Practical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan

    Takashi Kawaguchi

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

    Yusuke Kunimoto

  4. Department of Pharmacy, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Junichi Masuda & Ayako Numata

  5. Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan

    Atsushi Hirano

  6. Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan

    Hiroki Yagura

  7. Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan

    Masashi Ishihara

  8. Department of Pharmacy, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan

    Shinichi Hikasa

  9. Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan

    Mariko Tsukiji

  10. Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

    Tempei Miyaji & Takuhiro Yamaguchi

  11. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

    Ei Kinai & Kagehiro Amano

Authors
  1. Yusuke Sekine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Kawaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yusuke Kunimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junichi Masuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ayako Numata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Atsushi Hirano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hiroki Yagura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Masashi Ishihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shinichi Hikasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mariko Tsukiji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tempei Miyaji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Takuhiro Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ei Kinai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kagehiro Amano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YS and TK conceived the idea of the study. TK and TY developed the statistical analysis plan and conducted statistical analyses. YS, YK, JM, AN, HY, MI, SH, MT, and TT contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. YS drafted the original manuscript. KA supervised the conduct of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript draft and revised it critically on intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Sekine.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The approval and supervision of the ethical review committee of each institution were obtained. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekine, Y., Kawaguchi, T., Kunimoto, Y. et al. Adherence to anti-retroviral therapy, decisional conflicts, and health-related quality of life among treatment-naïve individuals living with HIV: a DEARS-J observational study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 9, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00277-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00277-y

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences

ISSN: 2055-0294

Contact us