Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program

Table 4 Results of McNemar’s test

Question		Pattern
		1	2	3	4
		hosp. → Yes	hosp. → No	hosp. → Yes	hosp. → No
		comm. → No	comm. → Yes	comm. → Yes	comm. → No
(1) Was a patient assignment system involved in the drug administration guidance, which enabled you to take care of the same patients every time?	2011	▼170^**	22	56	△220^**
	2012	△388^**	32	118	▼319^**
(2) Did you have a time to have a discussion or a review among students at the training site?	2011	157	40	▼93^***	△208^***
	2012	263	84	△316^***	▼238^***
(7) Did you have any opportunity to visit other facilities?	2011	9	△327^***	▼124^***	35
(7) Did you have any opportunity to visit other facilities?	2012	22	▼478^***	△327^***	72
(8) Did you pay any training expense or training cost when you attended a practical work or training at the outside of the training site?	2011	▼11^***	△53^*	17	418
	2012	△67^***	▼65^*	30	742

The words were omitted as following: the hospital pharmacy practice is “hosp.”; the community pharmacy practice is “comm.”
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

ISSN: 2055-0294