Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the proportions of TDM implementation for each anti-MRSA agent after propensity score matching when classified into pediatric patients (under 18-years old) and non-pediatric patients (18 years and older)

From: Association of the ward pharmacy service with active implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring for vancomycin and teicoplanin—an epidemiological surveillance study using Japanese large health insurance claims database

Description

Ward pharmacy service group

Non-ward pharmacy service group

P-value

Vancomycin

 Pediatric patients, n/n (%)

106/179 (59.2)

105/207 (50.7)

0.095 a)

 Non-pediatric patients, n/n (%)

487/678 (71.8)

412/650 (63.4)

0.001 a) *

Teicoplanin

 Pediatric patients, n/n (%)

35/87 (40.2)

22/102 (21.6)

0.005 a) *

 Non-pediatric patients, n/n (%)

79/135 (58.5)

55/120 (45.8)

0.043 a) *

Arbekacin

 Pediatric patients, n/n (%)

2/17 (11.8)

5/20 (25.0)

0.417 b)

 Non-pediatric patients, n/n (%)

9/35 (25.7)

7/32 (21.9)

0.713 a)

  1. TDM Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. a) Chi-squared test, b) Fisher’s exact test. *P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant