Skip to main content

Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives


To improve the adherence to and knowledge about pharmacotherapy in outpatients and to maximize the efficacy and minimize the adverse drug events, the first pharmacist-managed clinic (PMC) in Japan was established for anticoagulation therapy at Nagoya University Hospital in 2000. Since then, various PMCs such as for asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer’s disease, hypercholesterolemia, chronic hepatitis C, cancer chemotherapy, palliative care, chronic kidney disease, and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have been established and expanded to many hospitals in Japan. Accumulating evidences suggest that PMCs have some beneficial effects on patients’ adherence to and knowledge about their pharmacotherapy as well as the clinical outcome, besides being cost-effective. Notably, PMCs for cancer chemotherapy have been approved as a new medical service in hospitals in 2014, which is covered by the universal health coverage in Japan. In this review article, the current status of PMCs for patient education and counseling in Japan and their impact on pharmaceutical care and management are critically reviewed. Furthermore, future perspectives on PMCs are discussed.


Pharmacists can contribute to positive outcomes of pharmacotherapy by educating and counseling patients to prepare and motivate them to follow their pharmacotherapeutic regimens and monitoring plans. Education and counseling are most effective when conducted in a room or space that ensures privacy and the opportunity to engage in confidential communication [American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines on pharmacist-conducted patient education and counseling] [1]. Reinders and Steinke, for instance, reported the development, operation, patient management protocol, and teaching activities of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic for ambulatory patients in 1979. They concluded that this clinic gives the pharmacist a unique opportunity to provide comprehensive pharmaceutical services, to establish effective, long-term professional relationships with ambulant patients and their families, and to foster interdisciplinary health team activities [2]. To date, various pharmacist-managed clinics (PMCs) for chronic diseases or symptoms in different clinical settings have been reported in the United States [3-22] and other countries [23-28]. These include clinics undertaking education and counseling for anticoagulation [2,23,25-27], asthma [3], Helicobacter pylori infection [4], diabetes [7], hyperlipidemia [8,9], hypertension [10,11], latent tuberculosis infection [12], pain [13,14], smoking cessation [15], and cancer chemotherapy [21,22]. Beneficial effects of PMCs have been repeatedly reported in terms of cost-effectiveness, patients’ adherence to and knowledge about pharmacotherapy, and the outcome of treatment [29-34].


Pharmacist-managed clinics in Japan

An international exchange program for hospital pharmacists between Japan and the United States and other countries under a research program entitled “A role of hospital pharmacists in appropriate drug use” (PI: Toshitaka Nabeshima), which was supported by a Health Labour Science Research Grant (H10-Iyaku-068, 1998–2000) from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan, played an indispensable role in the introduction and development of pharmacist-managed clinics (PMCs) for patient education and counseling in Japan. In this 3-year program, 10 Japanese pharmacists studied abroad to see clinical pharmacy practices in the United States, and 8 visiting clinical pharmacists from foreign countries introduced PMCs and other pharmacy services, as well as pharmacy education, to Japan [35,36].

The first PMC in Japan was established for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin at Nagoya University Hospital in 2000 [37-39]. This was triggered by a request from a medical doctor in the vascular surgery department for hospital pharmacists to conduct patient education and pharmaceutical counseling for those who had taken warfarin for a long period, but for whom the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) value was unstable and sometimes outside of the target range. A hospital pharmacist, Dr. Keiko Yamamura, played an indispensable role in establishing this PMC. Implementation of this new clinical practice involving patient education and counseling was first reported in the 10th Clinical Pharmacy Symposium in Japan (Chiba, Japan, 2002). A PMC for asthma was also started at Nagoya University Hospital in 2001, for which a pharmacist, Dr. Masaya Hasegawa, played a crucial role [39,40]. At the same time, a PMC for asthma was introduced by Dr. Ritsuko Taniguchi into pharmacy education at Okayama University School of Pharmacy [41]. Drs. Yamamura, Hasegawa, and Taniguchi had all studied abroad with support from the international exchange program mentioned above [35].

At present, various PMCs are in operation at hospital pharmacies in Japan [42-50] (Table 1). For example, we now operate 7 PMCs at Nagoya University Hospital, such as for anticoagulation therapy, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), donepezil outpatient consultation service (DOCS), palliative care, chronic kidney disease, molecular-targeted drugs, and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Some of them are run in collaboration with schools of pharmacy. A PMC for DOCS is an example of such hospital pharmacist/faculty pharmacist collaboration. The DOCS provides pharmaceutical education and counseling about the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease and drug therapy with donepezil and other drugs to outpatients and their family members [44]. We have demonstrated that the DOCS improves understanding of the clinical features of Alzheimer’s disease in patients and provides pharmacological knowledge about antidementia drugs, leading to significantly better adherence to pharmacotherapy with donepezil [44].

Table 1 Examples of PMCs at hospital pharmacies in Japan

As a distinct feature of PMCs in Japan, the number of PMCs for cancer chemotherapy has rapidly increased in parallel with a paradigm shift of the treatment from inpatients to outpatients [45-50]. Of note, PMCs for cancer chemotherapy have been approved as a new medical service in hospitals in 2014, and are covered by the universal coverage in Japan, if certified oncology pharmacists, in agreement with physicians, conduct patient education and counseling about cancer chemotherapy with the consent of patients.

PMCs for anticoagulation therapy

Oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is beneficial for the primary and secondary prevention of life-threatening thromboembolic events. Warfarin exhibits anticoagulant actions and prophylactic effects on thrombosis by inhibiting the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors. It is useful for a variety of conditions including venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, mechanical prosthetic heart valves, coronary artery disease, and stroke [51,52]. There are some limitations, however, as to its safe and effective use. A narrow therapeutic index, hemorrhagic side effects, variations in dosage requirements, adherence, and multiple drug-drug and drug-food interactions all limit its clinical effectiveness or enhance its toxicity. In particular, the risk of major bleeding on warfarin is approximately 1-5% per year, and bleeding complications due to anticoagulants are among the most frequent adverse drug effects (ADEs) [53]. Accordingly, management, education, and counseling for anticoagulation therapy in outpatients are necessary and important for appropriate pharmacotherapy [54].

It has been reported that all hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events associated with warfarin were significantly reduced by a PMC in the University of Florida’s Family Practice [32]. Furthermore, by avoiding hospitalization and emergency room visits due to thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, potential cost avoidance was estimated if the control group had been followed by the anticoagulation monitoring service [32]. A retrospective assessment comparing a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic with physician management was recently reported using INR stability. The study demonstrated that the pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic had higher rates of INRs determined to be therapeutic and exhibited significantly less variability in therapeutic INR rates relative to a physician-managed service [33].

A cross-sectional pre- to post-counseling study was conducted at Nagoya University Hospital to assess the effects of a PMC for anticoagulation therapy on patients’ knowledge and the quality of the treatment [38]. This PMC significantly improved the patients’ knowledge about warfarin treatment and reduced the mean deviation from the PT-INR target range [37,38].

The development of reliable and accurate devices to measure PT-INR, such as Coaguchek, Pro Time Microcoagulation System, and Coumatrak monitor, has allowed self-testing by patients at home. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data showed that self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation are a safe option for suitable patients of all ages [55]. We have recently started clinical research to assess the safety and effectiveness of internet-based PMC for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin in combination with self-monitoring of PT-INR in patients who may have potential adverse drug interactions with warfarin. For example, both fluorouracil and miconazole are known to exhibit drug-drug interactions with warfarin, leading to potential side effects [56,57]. Accordingly, we applied the self-management of warfarin treatment supported by an internet-based PMC in combination with self-monitoring of PT-INR to 2 patients receiving concomitant treatment with either FOLFIRI chemotherapy [58] or miconazole gel [59]. By using the time in the therapeutic range as a measure of the quality of treatment [60], we reported that the internet-based PMC in combination with self-monitoring of PT-INR may be safe and effective for pharmacotherapy management of anticoagulation therapy in high-risk patients with potential drug-drug interactions [58,59].

In addition to warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants such as Factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, as well as a direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, have recently become available for anticoagulation therapy [52]. Because these new drugs also have some risks for bleeding and other ADEs [61,62], we have included pharmaceutical education and counseling on novel oral anticoagulants in the PMC at Nagoya University Hospital.

PMCs for asthma/COPD

Asthma and COPD are pulmonary disorders characterized by various degrees of airflow limitation, inflammation, and tissue remodeling. There are clear differences between these two diseases; the former originates in childhood and is best treated with anti-inflammatory steroids, whereas the latter occurs in adults who smoke and is best treated with bronchodilators and the removal of risk factors. The most important difference between asthma and COPD is the nature of the inflammation, which is primarily eosinophilic and CD4-driven in asthma, and neutrophilic and CD8-driven in COPD [63].

Asthma and COPD patients are mainly treated with inhalation medication, but it is difficult for many patients to use such medication correctly [64]. Thus, PMC for asthma/COPD should include education on how to use inhalation devices correctly. Furthermore, although exacerbations are potentially preventable by appropriate pharmacotherapy, patients often have difficulty following prescribed regimens. Thus, PMC for asthma/COPD may be able to enhance patient compliance and outcomes by engaging in pharmaceutical care activity such as monitoring symptoms, providing proper education on the correct handling of inhalation devices and inhalation technique, and medication counseling, helping resolve drug-related problems, and facilitating communication with physicians [65-68].

A large randomized controlled trial was conducted at 36 community drugstores (1113 participants) in the United States to assess the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical care program for patients with asthma or COPD [65]. Thirty-six drugstores were divided into 3 clusters: Pharmaceutical Care Program group, Peak Flow Monitoring Control group, and Usual Care Control group. The pharmaceutical care program provided pharmacists with recent patient-specific clinical data (peak expiratory flow rates, [PEFRs], emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and medication compliance), training, customized patient educational materials, and resources to facilitate program implementation. The PEFR monitoring control group received a peak flow meter, instructions about its use, and monthly calls to elicit PEFRs. However, PEFR data were not provided to the pharmacist. Patients in the usual care control group received neither peak flow meters nor instruction on their use; during monthly telephone interviews, PEFR rates were not elicited. The pharmaceutical care program increased patients’ PEFRs compared with those upon usual care, but provided little benefit compared with peak flow monitoring alone. Pharmaceutical care increased patient satisfaction but also increased the number of breathing-related emergency department or hospital visits (care-seeking behavior). These findings were interpreted as follows: implementation of the pharmacy program was poor, perhaps due to limited time or lack of incentives to use the resources provided, and resulted in limited benefits in terms of clinical endpoints [65].

On the other hand, a recent review article supported the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes of the National Institute of Health Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines in recognizing pharmacists as accessible healthcare practitioners who, via patient education and medication management, may help patients with asthma attain better control of their disease state [66]. Furthermore, in a randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial with a total of 133 COPD patients, significant improvements of COPD knowledge, medication adherence, medication beliefs, and a significant reduction in hospital admission rate were demonstrated by pharmaceutical care intervention delivered by clinical pharmacists [67]. A large-scale prospective cohort study in community pharmacies in Netherlands, in which the primary outcome was the reduction of oral high-dosage corticosteroids or antibiotics, demonstrated that community pharmacists actively providing comprehensive pharmacy care could improve effective treatment in asthma and COPD patients and thereby decrease the number of prescriptions for exacerbations in these patients [68].

A cross-sectional pre- to post-education/counseling study with 116 patients, who attended the PMC for asthma at Nagoya University Hospital, was conducted to assess the effects of the PMC on patients’ knowledge about the pathophysiology and drug treatment for asthma, inhalation skills, and clinical outcome [40]. The PMC significantly improved patients’ knowledge about the disease and its drug treatment. Furthermore, repeated counseling in the PMC improved PEFR and maintained it at a high level for over 2 years [40]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that pharmaceutical education and counseling in the PMC for asthma were effective in enhancing patients’ knowledge and adherence and increasing the PEFR of patients with any disease severity from mild to severe [69,70]. Significant positive correlations of medication adherence with inhalation technique and insights into the disease and medication were observed, but not with the state of disease control. It is suggested that patients who use an incorrect inhalation technique or have insufficient knowledge about the medication and pathophysiology have poor medication adherence [71].

PMCs for cancer chemotherapy

Adherence to oral chemotherapy regimens maximizes their effectiveness and minimizes any potential toxicity. It is suggested that patients with life-threatening conditions such as cancer would be highly motivated to follow their treatment regimens [72], but the available evidence suggests that a substantial population of patients, for example, teenage and young adult patients with cancer, have difficulty adhering to treatment regimens. Factors that affect treatment adherence in young patients with cancer include patient emotional functioning (depression and self-esteem), patient health beliefs (perceived illness severity and vulnerability), and family environment [73]. A recent study in postoperative breast cancer patients before pharmacist counseling for adjuvant systemic therapy at Nagumo Clinic in Tokyo revealed that fatigue, emotional functioning, systemic therapy side effects, future perspectives, and appetite loss are determinants affecting the quality of life. Taking these factors into consideration will aid pharmacist education and counseling [74]. Treatment-related factors that may influence medication adherence include complexity of the regimen, the cost of therapy, the possibility of side effects, and the delay in treatment benefits. Meanwhile, patients may not have an adequate support system or an understanding of the need for medication, and providers may not fully succeed in communicating the importance of adherence and the types of side effects that may occur [75].

Many studies have repeatedly and consistently reported the beneficial role of clinical pharmacists and PMCs for cancer chemotherapy in oncology settings in the United States and other countries [21,22,76-82]. For instance, a cross-sectional survey revealed that patients are interested in visiting a pharmacist regularly during chemotherapy treatment and may be willing to pay for a pharmacy counseling service [21]. A retrospective analysis of clinical interventions, cost-savings, and feedback from patients and colleagues confirmed the beneficial nature of services provided by clinical oncology pharmacists in an outpatient oncology center [22]. In a recent retrospective observational cohort study assessing the effectiveness of an oral chemotherapy management (OCM) clinic providing comprehensive medication therapy management (MTM) services, including education on various oral chemotherapy agents, concurrent medications, and symptom management as well as insurance assistance, it was indicated that this clinic is effective in delivering early interventions, resulting in decreased rates of adverse effects, nonadherence, drug interactions, and medication errors over time [78].

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) represent significant side effects in cancer patients. Poorly controlled CINV can lead to a decrease in the quality of life of patients, and to a change in the chemotherapy regimen. A 4-month longitudinal prospective intervention study was conducted to analyze the effects of pharmaceutical care (reviewing the antiemetic protocol and giving some recommendations to patients) on the incidence of delayed CINV in adult cancer outpatients. It was concluded that pharmaceutical intervention by pharmacists reduces the incidence of delayed CINV and improves medication adherence [79]. Another report described a collaborative practice agreement between pharmacists and physicians as one approach to managing chemotherapy-induced anemia in hematology-oncology patients in an anemia clinic. The pharmacist's role was justified in this clinic model through increased adherence to evidence-based practice guidelines and decreased costs associated with erythropoietin-stimulating agent therapy [83]. Alternatively, it was indicated that health-system pharmacists played an important role in screening patients with a history of breast or prostate cancer for bone loss or osteoporosis, making drug therapy recommendations to address the problem, and counseling patients on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis and proper use of drug therapies to improve bone health [84].

In Japan, hospital pharmacists mix anticancer agents for intravenous cancer chemotherapy for both outpatients and inpatients and check the regimens. Furthermore, clinical pharmacists are expected to participate actively in cancer chemotherapy with pharmaceutical knowledge and skills to enhance patient understanding and adherence to the regimens and to secure the safety of treatment. Accordingly, the number of PMCs for cancer chemotherapy has rapidly increased in parallel with a paradigm shift of treatment from an inpatient to an outpatient basis [45-50].

The initial PMC for cancer chemotherapy was focused on patients taking TS-1 at Kyoto University Hospital, and participated in safe and effective chemotherapy for outpatients [45]. The usefulness of PMC for XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) therapy in colorectal cancer patients was evaluated at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, in which pharmacists interviewed patients about their medication compliance, adverse effects, and supportive care, in advance of a physician’s assessments [48]. The endpoints included the number and content of inquiries about XELOX and the rate of adoption of suggestions by pharmacists for supportive care. The number of inquiries concerning XELOX was significantly fewer in the PMC group with pharmaceutical interventions (14/260 patients, 5.3%) than in the control group without consultation in the PMC (43/256 patients, 16.8%) [48]. A recent assessment of a PMC for cancer chemotherapy at the International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital indicated that the respective degrees of understanding of drugs, treatment schedule, and the side effects and their prevention were significantly improved by consultation in the PMC compared with those without PMC consultation. In this study, a majority of patients (44/50, 88%) who had had some anxiety about chemotherapy reported that their anxiety levels were reduced by the counseling in the PMC [49]. The outcome analysis of pharmaceutical care in outpatients who had received cancer chemotherapy at Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital indicated that the rate of amelioration of symptoms associated with chemotherapy was significantly higher (94/145 cases, 65%) when a pharmacist’s suggestions about the prescription were adopted by the physician than the rate when the suggestions were not adopted (6/17 cases, 35%) [50]. These results support the clinical significance of PMCs for cancer chemotherapy, while the cost-effectiveness of this clinical practice by pharmacists should be demonstrated in future studies.

Future perspectives

PMCs for patient education and counseling in Japan are now expanding from anticoagulation therapy to cancer chemotherapy at hospital pharmacies. However, the contents of PMC as well as the clinical effects may vary depending upon the hospitals where the service is provided, the diseases/symptoms and pharmacotherapy that are targeted, and the knowledge and skills of individual pharmacists who participate in PMCs. The effects of PMCs on cost-effectiveness, patients’ adherence to and knowledge about pharmacotherapy, and clinical outcome have not yet been completely clarified in Japan. Furthermore, patient education and counseling at community pharmacies in the country have been limited, and there are few published reports about the implementation of PMCs at community pharmacies and their clinical impact. Last but not least, there has been almost no outreach activity for PMCs offered in Japan.

In spite of this background, PMCs for cancer chemotherapy have been approved as a new medical service in hospitals, and are covered by the universal health coverage in Japan. One might interpret this as a result of our continuous efforts; hospital pharmacists have provided pharmaceutical care and management for inpatients during the last 20 years, so their roles in pharmacotherapy management and patient education and counseling are now well recognized by medical staff and health insurance providers in Japan.

To maintain or even increase the reliability of both hospital pharmacists and community pharmacists as professionals for pharmaceutical care and management, we need to understand the current status and problems of PMCs mentioned above, and then refine the system (Table 2). There is an urgent need to develop guidelines for PMCs, which could be universally adapted in various clinical settings from cancer chemotherapy at hospital pharmacies to anticoagulation therapy and asthma/COPD treatment at community pharmacies. Such PMC guidelines should include the purpose, background, required knowledge and skills of pharmacists, the environment, the pharmacists’ roles, the steps in the patient education and counseling process, content, and documentation [1]. It is desirable for the Japanese Society of Hospital Pharmacists (JSHP) to take a leadership role in developing such guidelines in collaboration with the Japan Pharmaceutical Association. In PMCs operated in accordance with such guidelines, we should evaluate our clinical practice and provide reliable evidence that patient education and counseling by pharmacists have beneficial effects on patients’ adherence to and knowledge about their pharmacotherapy as well as the clinical outcome, besides being cost-effective. In addition, we need to undertake deep consideration of the outreach activity for PMCs, through which the roles of hospital pharmacists in pharmacotherapy management in PMCs, such as for cancer chemotherapy, can be further appreciated by society.

Table 2 The proposal to improve the quality of PMCs in Japan


Since the first PMC in Japan was established for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin at Nagoya University Hospital in 2000, various PMCs have been expanded and implemented at hospital pharmacies in the country. As a result, PMCs for cancer chemotherapy have been approved as a new medical service in hospitals in 2014, and are covered by the universal health coverage in Japan. Although beneficial effects of PMCs on cost-effectiveness, patients’ adherence to and knowledge about pharmacotherapy, and the outcome of treatment have been repeatedly reported in the United States, the evidence is limited in Japan. There is an urgent need to develop guidelines on PMCs, which could be universally adapted in various clinical settings. We should evaluate our clinical practice and provide evidence that patient education and counseling by pharmacists are clinically valuable. Furthermore, outreach activity for PMCs should be offered, through which the roles of hospital pharmacists in pharmacotherapy management in PMC will be further appreciated by society.



Adverse drug event


American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Donepezil outpatient consultation service


Japanese Society of Hospital Pharmacists


Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences


Medication therapy management


Oral chemotherapy management


Peak expiratory flow rate


Pharmacist-managed clinic


Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio


  1. 1.

    ᅟ: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists ; ᅟ. []

  2. 2.

    Reinders TP, Steinke WE: Pharmacist management of anticoagulant therapy in ambulant patients. Am J Hosp Pharm 1979, 36:645–648.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pauley TR, Magee MJ, Cury JD: Pharmacist-managed, physician-directed asthma management program reduces emergency department visits. Ann Pharmacother 1995, 29:5–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Morreale AP: Pharmacist-managed Helicobacter pylori clinic. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1995, 52:183–185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McNicholl IR, Raebel MA: Malaria epidemiology and economics in a pharmacist-managed international travel clinic. Pharmacotherapy 1999, 19:1363–1368.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chisholm MA, Vollenweider LJ, Mulloy LL, Wynn JJ, Wade WE, DiPiro JT: Cost-benefit analysis of a clinical pharmacist-managed medication assistance program in a renal transplant clinic. Clin Transplant 2000, 14:304–307.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Davidson MB, Karlan VJ, Hair TL: Effect of a pharmacist-managed diabetes care program in a free medical clinic. Am J Med Qual 2000, 15:137–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bozovich M, Rubino CM, Edmunds J: Effect of a clinical pharmacist-managed lipid clinic on achieving National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein goals. Pharmacotherapy 2000, 20:1375–1383.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cording MA, Engelbrecht-Zadvorny EB, Pettit BJ, Eastham JH, Sandoval R: Development of a pharmacist-managed lipid clinic. Ann Pharmacother 2002, 36:892–904.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Okamoto MP, Nakahiro RK: Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of a pharmacist-managed hypertension clinic. Pharmacotherapy 2001, 21:1337–1344.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Geber J, Parra D, Beckey NP, Korman L: Optimizing drug therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: the impact of pharmacist-managed pharmacotherapy clinics in a primary care setting. Pharmacotherapy 2002, 22:738–747.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tavitian SM, Spalek VH, Bailey RP: A pharmacist-managed clinic for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in health care workers. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003, 60:1856–1861.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rapoport A, Akbik H: Pharmacist-managed pain clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004, 61:1341–1343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Weitzel KW, Presley DN, Showalter ML, Seymour S, Waddell RF: Pharmacist-managed headache clinic. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004, 61:2548–2550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dent LA, Scott JG, Lewis E: Pharmacist-managed tobacco cessation program in Veterans Health Administration community-based outpatient clinic. J Am Pharm Assoc 2003, 44:700–714.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kolor B: Patient education and treatment strategies implemented at a pharmacist-managed hepatitis C virus clinic. Pharmacotherapy 2005, 25:1230–1241.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    March K, Mak M, Louie SG: Effects of pharmacists’ interventions on patient outcomes in an HIV primary care clinic. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007, 64:2574–2578.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Loughlin SM, Mortazavi A, Garey KW, Rice GK, Birtcher KK: Pharmacist-managed vaccination program increased influenza vaccination rates in cardiovascular patients enrolled in a secondary prevention lipid clinic. Pharmacotherapy 2007, 27:729–733.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Clapp SE, Bardo JA, Chrymko MM: Implementation of a pharmacist-managed clinic for patients receiving erythropoietin-stimulating agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008, 65:1458–1463.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Phan SV, VandenBerg AM: Financial impact of a pharmacist-managed clinic for long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2012, 69:1014–1015.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    McKee M, Frei BL, Garcia A, Fike D, Soefje SA: Impact of clinical pharmacy services on patients in an outpatient chemotherapy academic clinic. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2011, 17:387–394.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ruder AD, Smith DL, Madsen MT, Kass FH 3rd: Is there a benefit to having a clinical oncology pharmacist on staff at a community oncology clinic? J Oncol Pharm Pract 2011, 17:425–432.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Choe HM, Kim J, Choi KE, Mueller BA: Implementation of the first pharmacist-managed ambulatory care anticoagulation clinic in South Korea. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002, 59:872–874.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee VW, Leung PY: Glycemic control and medication compliance in diabetic patients in a pharmacist-managed clinic in Hong Kong. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003, 60:2593–2596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dib JG, Mohammed K, Momattin HI, Alshehri AM: Implementation of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in a saudi arabian health center. Hosp Pharm 2014, 49:260–268.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Thanimalai S, Shafie AA, Hassali MA, Sinnadurai J: Comparing effectiveness of two anticoagulation management models in a Malaysian tertiary hospital. Int J Clin Pharm 2013, 35:736–743.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Manji I, Pastakia SD, DO AN, Ouma MN, Schellhase E, Karwa R, Miller ML, Saina C, Akwanalo C: Performance outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in the rural, resource-constrained setting of Eldoret, Kenya. J Thromb Haemost 2011, 9:2215–2220.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Conde-Estevez D, Salas E, Albanell J: Survey of oral chemotherapy safety and adherence practices of hospitals in Spain. Int J Chin Pharm 2013, 35:1236–1244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Aspinall SL, Cunningham FE, Zhao X, Boresi JS, Tonnu-Mihara IQ, Smith KJ, Stone RA, Good CB, ESA Clinic Study Group: Impact of pharmacist-managed erythropoiesis-stimulating agents clinics for patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2012, 60:371–379.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Snider M, Carnes C, Grover J, Davis R, Kalbfleisch S: Cost-benefit and cost-savings analyses of antiarrhythmic medication monitoring. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2012, 69:1569–1573.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wallgren S, Berry-Cabán CS, Bowers L: Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on diabetes-related outcomes in a military treatment facility. Ann Pharmacother 2012, 46:353–357.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wilt VM, Gums JG, Ahmed OI, Moore LM: Outcome analysis of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service. Pharmacotherapy 1995, 15:732–739.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Garton L, Crosby JF: A retrospective assessment comparing pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic with physician management using international normalized ratio stability. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011, 32:426–430.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vivian EM: Improving blood pressure control in a pharmacist-managed hypertension clinic. Pharmacotherapy 2002, 22:1533–1540.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nabeshima T: Activity of international communication committee (1998–2005). J Jpn Soc Hosp Pharm 2005, 41:887–893.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nabeshima T: Our bright future: international collaboration in pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008, 65:2055–2057.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fukase F, Yamamura K, Sakurai T, Yano K, Mizuno A, Torimoto M, Matsuba K, Nishida M, Nabeshima T: Outpatient pharmaceutical care -Warfarin classroom-. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2003, 29:575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yano K, Yamamura K, Osada T, Fukase F, Kiriyama N, Torimoto M, Yamada K, Kishi DT, Nabeshima T: Documenting the value of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation classroom. J Appl Ther Res 2008, 6:41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yamamura K, Osada T, Watanabe N, Hasegawa M: Roles of the pharmaceutical care clinic for outpatients run by pharmacist at Naogya University Hospital: evaluation of medication counseling in terms of patient knowledge and medication therapy by using scoring system. Aichi-Gakuin J Pharm Sci 2012, 5:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hasegawa M, Takagi K, Shimokata K, Byrd HJ, Nabeshima T: Evaluation of “bronchial asthma pharmaceutical care clinic for outpatients” run by pharmacists at Nagoya University Hospital. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2006, 32:1038–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Taniguchi R, Okamoto T, Futagami K, Kawasaki H, Arakai H, Gomita Y, Lander R: Counseling of patients with bronchial asthma, and clinical pharmacy practice and education of pharmacy school students. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2003, 29:715–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shintoh M, Iwakawa S, Shimada Y, Fujita M, Sugahara K, Konishi K: Effects of pharmacist’ consultation on serum cholesterol level using drug history notebool or drug instruction sheet for outpatients with hypercholesterolemia. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2001, 27:337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Haga H, Asai H, Asada M, Fukushima N: An educational initiative for pharmacists to inform patients about peglyated-interferon and rivavirin combination therapy in outpatient clinic. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2012, 38:95–110.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Watanabe N, Yamamura K, Suzuki Y, Umegaki H, Shigeno K, Matsushita R, Miyamoto K, Yamada K: Pharmacist-based donepezil outpatient consultation service to improve medication persistence. Patiet Prefer Adher 2012, 6:605–611.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Iwai C, Kobayashi M, Terada T, Yano I, Matumoto S, Yanagihara K, Fukushima M, Inui K: Continuous pharmaceutical consultation regarding chemotherapy combined with TS-1 in outpatient oncology unit: establishment of patient education system and active provision of pharmaceutical care. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2009, 35:866–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Imamura M, Nakura H, Takemoto C: Evaluation of usefulness of pharmaceutical outpatient clinic for cancer patients. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2010, 36:85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Makihara K, Ohta M, Ueno H, Hama I: Effectiveness of interventions by pharmacists in ensuring safety and efficacy of outpatient chemotherapy prescriptions. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2010, 36:880–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mae Y, Yokokawa T, Kawakami K, Yagi N, Suenaga M, Shinozaki E, Matsusaka S, Mizunuma N, Hama T: Usefulness of pharmaceutical outpatient clinic in XELOX therapy. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2011, 37:611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Nakajima K, Mano Y, Ohuchi K, Sato D, Iwata K, Higuchi A, Ebara K, Kato Y, Hirosawa K, Tajima M, Tsuchiya F, Yamada H, Kotaki H, Asahi M: Role of pharmaceutical outpatient clinic in cancer patients and evaluation. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2012, 38:599–608.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sudo M, Morii H, Sakanaka M, Noda S, Wakasugi Y, Hukutake N, Kawai Y, Mekata E, Terada T: Introduction of pharmaceutical care and its effects in outpatients with cancer chemotherapy. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2013, 39:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Go AS, Hylek EM, Chang Y, Phillips KA, Henault LE, Capra AM, Jensvold NG, Selby JV, Singer DE: Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice? JAMA 2003, 290:2685–2692.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Baetz B, Spinler S: Dabigatran etexilate: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Pharmacotherapy 2008, 80:1354–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Francis CW: New issues in oral anticoagulants. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008 :259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Valentine KA, Hull RD: Outpatient Management of Anticoagulation With Warfarin. UpToDate. ; ᅟ.

  55. 55.

    Heneghan C, Ward A, Perera R, Self-Monitoring Trialist C, Bankhead C, Fuller A, Stevens R, Bradford K, Tyndel S, Alonso-Coello P, Ansell J, Beyth R, Bernardo A, Christensen TD, Cromheecke ME, Edson RG, Fitzmaurice D, Gadisseur AP, Garcia-Alamino JM, Gardiner C, Hasenkam JM, Jacobson A, Kaatz S, Kamali F, Khan TI, Knight E, Körtke H, Levi M, Matchar D, Menéndez-Jándula B, Rakovac I, Schaefer C, Siebenhofer A, Souto JC, Sunderji R, Gin K, Shalansky K, Völler H, Wagner O, Zittermann A: Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2012, 379:322–334.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Yamamuro F, Miki A, Kondo G, Maeda T, Satoh H, Hori S, Sawada Y: Individual differences in prothrombin time-international normalized ratio variation following coadministration of the anticancer agents S-1 and warfarin: 3 case reports. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011, 49:700–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Miki A, Ohtani H, Sawada Y: Warfarin and miconazole oral gel interactions: analysis and therapy recommendations based on clinical data and a pharmacokinetic model. J Clin Pharm Ther 2011, 36:642–650.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Obara M, Yano K, Shigeno K, Hibi Y, Miyagawa Y, Tanaka C, Kodera Y, Yamamura K, Yamada K: Protocol-based pharmacotherapy management by internet-based PMC for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin in combination with self-monitoring of PT-INR in a patient receiving FOLFIRI therapy. In Proceeding of the 23 rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences: 21–22 September 2013. Edited by Mano S. Sendai: Division of Clinical Pharmacuetical Sciences, The Pharmacuetical Society of Japan; 2013:306.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Okajima A, Yano K, Kamitani H, Kuzuya M, Yamada K: A Case Report of Protocol-Based Pharmacotherapy Management by Internet-Based PMC for Anticoagulation Therapy with Warfarin In Combination With Self-Monitoring of PT-INR in a Patient Receiving Miconazole Gel. In Proceeding of the 24 th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences: 27–28 September 2014. Edited by Okuda M. Nagoya;ᅟ; 2014. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nielsen PB, Lundbye-Christensen S, Rasmussen LH, Larsen TB: Improvement of anticoagulant treatment using a dynamic decision support algorithm: a Danish Cohort study. Thromb Res 2014, 133:375–379.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Donaldson M, Norbeck AO: Adverse events in patients initiated on dabigatran etexilate therapy in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2013, 11:90–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lee PY, Han SY, Miyahara RK: Adherence and outcomes of patients treated with dabigatran: pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic versus usual care. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013, 70:1154–1561.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Buist AS: Similarities and differences between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: treatment and early outcomes. Eur Respir J 2003, 21(Suppl 39):30s–35s.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Arora P, Kumar L, Vohra V, SarPT-INR, Jaiswal A, Puri MM, Rathee D, Chakraborty P: Evaluating the technique of using inhalation device in COPD and Bronchial Asthma patients. Respir Med 2014, S0954-6111(14):00168–1.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Weinberger M, Murray MD, Marrero DG, Brewer N, Lykens M, Harris LE, Seshadri R, Caffrey H, Roesner JF, Smith F, Newell AJ, Collins JC, McDonald CJ, Tierney WM: Effectiveness of pharmacist care for patients with reactive airways disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288:1594–1602.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Benavides S, Rodriguez JC, Maniscalco-Feichtl M: Pharmacist involvement in improving asthma outcomes in various healthcare settings: 1997 to present. Ann Pharmacother 2009, 43:85–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Jarab AS, Alqudah SG, Khdour M, Shamssain M, Mukattash TL: Impact of pharmaceutical care on health outcomes in patients with COPD. Int J Clin Pharm 2012, 34:53–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ottenbros S, Teichert M, de Groot R, Griens F, Sodihardjo F, Wensing M, de Gier JJ: Pharmacist let intervention study to improve drug therapy in asthma and COPD patients. Int J Clin Pharm 2014, 36:336–344.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Kurata Y, Kishi R, Yamada S, Hasegawa M, Yamada K, Kume H, Hasegawa Y, Nabeshima T, Noda Y: Evaluation of activities conducted by pharmaceutical care clinic with respect to outpatient inhalation treatment. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2009, 35:145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Yamada S, Kuwahara H, Asai R, Kotani H, Kishi R, Hirabayashi A, Mizuno T, Hasegawa M, Mouri A, Kume H, Ito S, Hasegawa Y, Nabeshima T, Yamada K, Noda Y: Evaluation of the symptoms, adherence and satisfaction after pharmaceutical care at asthma clinic for outpatient. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 2011, 113:1629–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Nagai T, Goto A, Asai R, Tsubai T, Hida H, Mouri A, Miyazaki M, Kume H, Ito S, Hasegawa Y, Yamada K, Noda Y: Factors affecting adherence to inhalation therapy in outpatients with asthma: inhalation instruction in Asthama Pharmaceutical Care Clinic. Jpn J Pharm Health Care Sci 2014, ᅟ:ᅟ. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Ellis J: How adolescents cope with cancer and its treatment. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1991, 16:157–161.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kondryn HJ, Edmondson CL, Hill J, Eden TOB: Treatment non-adherence in teenage and young adult patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol 2012, 12:100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kawaguchi T, Iwase S, Koinuma M, Onodera Y, Takeuchi H, Umeda M, Matsunaga T, Unezaki S, Nagumo Y: Determinants affecting quality of life: implications for pharmacist counseling for patients with breast cancer in Japan. Biol Pharm Bull 2012, 35:59–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    McCue DA, Lohr LK, Pick AM: Improving adherence to oral cancer therapy in clinical practice. Pharmacotherapy 2014, 34:481–494.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Shah S, Dowell J, Greene S: Evaluation of clinical pharmacy services in a hematology/oncology outpatient setting. Ann Pharmacother 2006, 40:1527–1533.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Valgus JM, Faso A, Gregory KM, Jarr S, Savage S, Caiola S, Walko CM, Kim J, Bernard SA: Integration of a clinical pharmacist into the hematology-oncology clinics at an academic medical center. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011, 68:613–619.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Wong SF, Bounthavong M, Nguyen C, Bechtoldt K, Hernandez E: Implementation and preliminary outcomes of a comprehensive oral chemotherapy management clinic. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014, 71:960–965.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Caracuel F, Banos U, Herrera MD, Ramirez G, Munoz N: Influence of pharmaceutical care on the delayed emesis associated with chemotherapy. Int J Clin Pharm 2014, 36:287–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Chan A, Shih V, Chew L: Evolving roles of oncology pharmacists in Singapore: a survey on prescribing patterns of antiemetics for chemotherapy induced nauses and vomiting (CINV) at a cancer centre. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2008, 14:23–29.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Tuffaha HW, Abdelhadi O, Omar SA: Clinical pharmacy service in the outpatient pediatric oncology clinics at a comprehensive cancer center. Int J Clin Pharm 2012, 34:27–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ibrahim NA, Bjornsdottir I, Alwan AS, Honore PH: Insights about health-related quality of life in cancer patients indicate demands for better pharmaceutical care. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2013, ᅟ:ᅟ.in press.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Gilreath JA, Sageser DS, Jorgenson JA, Rodgers GM: Establishing an anemia clinic for optimal erythropoietic-stimulating agent use in hematology-oncology patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008, 6:577–584.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Michaud LB: Managing cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis in patients with breast or prostate cancer. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010, 67(7 Suppl 3):S20–S30.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank all pharmacists who participated in the PMC at Nagoya University Hospital. We also thank Drs. Keiko Yamamura, Masaya Hasegawa, Yukihiro Noda, and Koji Yano for their valuable comments on this manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyofumi Yamada.

Additional information

Competing interests

Kiyofumi Yamada (Roche Diagnostics K.K.).

Authors’ contributions

KY and TN wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamada, K., Nabeshima, T. Pharmacist-managed clinics for patient education and counseling in Japan: current status and future perspectives. J Pharm Health Care Sci 1, 2 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Pharmacist-managed clinic
  • Pharmaceutical care
  • Adherence
  • Patient education
  • Anticoagulation
  • Asthma
  • COPD
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Cancer chemotherapy