Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Bleeding risk factors and real-world antithrombotic therapies in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences volume 9, Article number: 41 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are unclear and data on the use of antithrombotic drugs are lacking. We investigated the bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI to help optimize antithrombotic therapy according to bleeding risk. We also investigated the association between the actual use of antithrombotic therapy and bleeding events.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 134 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent primary PCI at the Department of Cardiology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital. The endpoint was a bleeding event within 1-year. Bleeding risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis. The association between the number of antithrombotics and bleeding events was evaluated using the chi-squared test.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 76.0 ± 6.2 years. Bleeding events occurred in 41 (30.6%) patients. Age > 80 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–5.85), multivessel disease (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.22–6.23), and history of surgery (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.14–8.06) were identified as bleeding risk factors. The proportion of patients receiving triple therapy was significantly higher in the bleeding group compared to the non-bleeding group (70.7% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Age > 80, multivessel disease, and history of surgery were found to be risk factors for bleeding in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. In addition, dual therapy after PCI in elderly patients at high risk of bleeding should be considered to avoid bleeding events.

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heart rhythm caused by chaotic electrical impulses from the atria that are conducted through the ventricles. The Global Burden of Disease Project reported a global prevalence of approximately 40.6 million persons with AF in 2017 [1]. AF is a risk factor for cardiogenic brain embolism that requires long-term oral anticoagulation if the risk of embolic events is high [2].

Approximately 20–30% of patients with AF have concomitant ischemic heart diseases, such as angina or myocardial infarction [3]. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used for revascularization in ischemic heart disease. Patients undergoing PCI are administered dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin to prevent stent thrombosis and recurrent myocardial infarction [4]. The widespread use of second-generation drug-eluting stents and hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) inhibitors has significantly reduced the incidence rate of stent thrombosis after PCI to approximately 1% [5].

In contrast, the rate of bleeding events associated with the use of anticoagulants in patients with AF is 10–15%; moreover, the use of both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents after PCI increases the risk of bleeding in patients with AF compared with anticoagulation alone [6, 7], and even more so in elderly patients [8]. Therefore, in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI, the high risk of bleeding due to concomitant antithrombotic use and age is a therapeutic challenge. As the world’s population ages, the number of very elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI is increasing [9]. As bleeding complications after PCI are strongly associated with mortality [10], it is important to predict the risk of bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Several risk factors for bleeding have been reported in patients undergoing PCI or with AF. Major factors include reduced renal function, anemia, history of bleeding, history of surgery or trauma, concomitant antithrombotic drugs, and older age [11, 12]. However, the risk factors for bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI are unclear. The identification of bleeding risk factors in these patients may help to plan treatment, including setting the intensity and duration of antiplatelet medication.

Current guidelines recommend shortening the duration of triple therapy [oral anticoagulant (OAC) + dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)], followed by dual therapy (OAC + antiplatelet agent alone) for up to 12 months after PCI if the risk of bleeding is high [13]. However, there is a lack of data on antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI.

We aimed to identify the risk factors of bleeding events in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI to help optimize antithrombotic therapy according to bleeding risk. We also aimed to clarify the association between the actual use of antithrombotic therapy and bleeding events.

Methods

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Showa University School of Pharmacy, Japan (Approval No. 379 on June 11, 2020). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study population

Out of the 2,608 patients who underwent primary PCI, this retrospective cohort study enrolled 201 patients aged 65 years or older with AF who were admitted to Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2020 and were started on antiplatelet therapy. The exclusion criteria were as follows: no anticoagulant use during hospitalization; upcoming surgery; history of valve replacement; and aneurysms. Patients who could not participate in follow-up for 1 year after the index PCI and those with bleeding events related to the index PCI were also excluded. Sixty-seven patients were excluded and 134 patients were included in the analysis (Additional file: Supplementary material 1).

Data collection of patient characteristics

Data were collected from the medical records of participants. Baseline patient characteristics included age, sex, body weight, body mass index, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, history of surgery, history of bleeding, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, and concomitant disease or medical history. Baseline lesion and interventional characteristics included the number of target lesions at index PCI, lesion site, chronic total occlusion, multivessel disease, stent type, and clinical presentation. Laboratory data included white blood cell count, albumin, hemoglobin, platelets, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine kinase, C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

Patient information at discharge included duration of hospital stay and medications, such as type and dose of oral anticoagulants, number of antithrombotic agents, proton pump inhibitors, HMG-CoA inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, eicosapentaenoic acid, P-glycoprotein inhibitors, and long-term use of glucocorticoids.

Definitions

Participants who were 65 years or older were considered elderly, according to the World Health Organization classification of elderly individuals. A history of surgery was defined as any surgery performed under general anesthesia, endoscopic surgery, or catheter ablation within 1 year before PCI. A history of bleeding was defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) class ≥ 2 [14]. Anemia was defined as a history of anemia or hemoglobin level < 11 g/dL [15]. Hypertension was defined as casual blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or the current use of antihypertensive drugs. Dyslipidemia was defined as the use of a lipid-lowering agent or casual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level > 140 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 40 mg/dL, or triglyceride level > 150 mg/dL. Diabetes was defined as treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent, casual plasma glucose level > 200 mg/dL, or HbA1c > 6.5%.

Cut-off considerations

eGFR was considered with cut-off values of 15, 30, 45, and 60 mL/min/1.73 m², in accordance with the severity classification outlined in the CKD guidelines. The odds ratio (OR) demonstrated a linear increase when eGFR was stratified into three groups based on the cut-off values of < 30, 30–45, and > 45 mL/min/1.73 m². Additionally, renal function was assessed based on CrCl. The cut-off values for CrCl were < 30, 30–50, and > 50 mL/min, which are the selection criteria for determining the appropriate anticoagulant dose. The cut-off value for age was set at 80 years based on the receiver operating characteristic curve (Additional file: Supplementary material 2).

Clinical endpoints and follow-up

The primary endpoints were defined as BARC class 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, or 5 bleeding events within 1 year after the index PCI, while the secondary endpoints were BARC 3 or 5 major bleeding events within one year after the index PCI [14]. The first bleeding event was collected if multiple bleeding events occurred during 1 year of follow-up.

Status of the use of antithrombotic drugs

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet status was assessed after PCI and monitored during 1 year of follow-up. Antiplatelet drugs included aspirin, clopidogrel, and prasugrel. For each year of PCI, the proportion of patients continuing triple antithrombotic therapy for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge was calculated.

We defined OAC as warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. For direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) administration, “standard dose” and “low-dose” were defined as administration according to the standard or low-dose regimens, respectively. Dose selection of each DOAC was evaluated based on the manufacturer labeling recommendations in Japan. The following low-dose regimens were considered appropriate: dabigatran 110 mg (twice daily) for patients aged ≥ 70 years, with a CrCl of 30–50 mL/min or a history of bleeding; rivaroxaban 10 mg (once daily) for patients with a CrCl of 15–50 mL/min; apixaban 2.5 mg (twice daily) for patients with any two of the following characteristics: age ≥ 80 years, with a body weight of ≤ 60 kg, and a serum creatinine level of ≥ 1.5 mg/dL; and edoxaban 30 mg (once daily) for patients with a CrCl of 15–50 mL/min or a body weight of ≤ 60 kg.

Underdosing (off-label low-dose) therapy was defined as the use of a low-dose of DOACs despite meeting the standard dose criteria. Overdosing (off-label standard dose) therapy was defined as the use of a standard dose of DOACs despite meeting the low-dose regimen criteria. The number of antithrombotic agents was investigated at the time of bleeding in the bleeding event group and at the end of observation in the without-bleeding event group. Triple therapy was defined as the combination of an anticoagulant and DAPT, while dual therapy was defined as the combination of an anticoagulant and a single antiplatelet drug.

Statistical analysis

Sample size

We calculated that the required sample size was 105 patients to detect an OR of 2.0 with 80% power at a significance level of 0.05, using an equivalence test of the hypotheses and assuming the bleeding event rate to be 20%. Therefore, the sample size in this study was sufficient to reach a valid conclusion.

Univariate and multivariate analyses

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented as the number of persons with frequency. Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables of patients with and without bleeding events. Significant variables extracted using the univariate analysis with less than 10% missing values were entered into the multivariate analysis. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. A stepwise selection method was used to identify factors independently associated with bleeding events and major bleeding events after PCI.

Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with bleeding events after PCI in two specific populations: (1) individuals receiving VKA at discharge and (2) individuals receiving DOACs at discharge. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Development and evaluation of a bleeding risk model

A formula for predicting the bleeding risk was developed using logistic regression analysis. The analysis was performed by adding three risk factors for bleeding events - eGFR [11], anemia [11], and hypertension [16] - as covariates to statistically significant factors determined by the multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). C-statistics of established bleeding risk factors were calculated, and factors with high C-statistics were selected as covariates (Additional file: Supplementary material 3). The accuracy of each model formula was then compared using the C-statistic, and the model formula with the highest C-statistic was selected as the final model (Additional file: Supplementary material 4).

Furthermore, a risk model was developed using the prediction formula for the bleeding risk. The OR for each factor in the final model formula was divided by the smallest OR among the factors and approximated to the nearest integer. Each factor was then assigned a score of 2 points if the calculation result was ≥ 2, and 1 point if it was < 2. The accuracy of the risk model was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The total score for each patient was calculated by summing the scores of each factor. Patients were divided into three groups based on their scores, and bleeding event rates were compared among the three groups using chi-square tests.

Association between antithrombotic use and bleeding events

The associations of triple therapy duration with bleeding events, DOAC dose at discharge with bleeding events, and the number of anticoagulants with bleeding events were each examined using the chi-square test. In the triple therapy and dual therapy, the bleeding rates between the developed risk models were compared using the chi-square test. As the number of antithrombotic agents can potentially vary over time, the study delved into exploring the relationship between the number of such agents at the time of bleeding and the occurrence of bleeding events. The relationship between the number of antithrombotic agents at the time of bleeding or at the end of observation and bleeding events was investigated using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics

The baseline patient characteristics, PCI profile, and discharge medications are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 76 years (± 6.2 years) and 111 participants (82.8%) were male. Twenty-two (16.4%) patients had a history of surgery, including gastrointestinal surgery (n = 10), surgery related to malignancy (n = 7), orthopedic surgery (n = 4), thoracotomy for cardiac rupture (n = 1), and other endoscopic surgery (n = 3). At discharge, 130 patients (97.0%) were on triple therapy, while four patients (3.0%) were on dual therapy.

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics, PCI profile, and discharge medications
Full size table

Endpoints

Bleeding events classified as BARC class ≥ 2 occurred in 41 (30.6%) patients. The median time to the bleeding event was 70 (range: 3–363) days. The proportion of each bleeding event according to BARC criteria is as follows: BARC 2: 25 (61.0%); BARC 3a: 10 (24.4%); BARC 3b: 3 (7.3%); BARC 3c: 1 (2.4%); BARC 5: 2 (4.9%) (Additional file: Supplementary material 5). The location of the bleeding event is also shown in Additional file: Supplementary material 5.

Univariate and multivariate analyses

Risk factors for bleeding events

Age > 80 years [OR: 2.536, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.099–5.853; p = 0.029], multivessel disease (OR: 2.761, 95% CI: 1.223–6.231; p = 0.014), and history of surgery (OR: 3.031, 95% CI: 1.141–8.055; p = 0.026) were identified as independent risk factors of bleeding events after PCI in elderly patients with AF (Table 2).

Table 2 Bleeding risk factors in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI
Full size table

Subgroup analysis

The results of the subgroup analyses are presented in Additional file: Supplementary materials 6 and 7. In the population taking VKA at discharge, a history of bleeding was identified as a bleeding risk factor (OR: 5.000, 95% CI: 1.111–22.500, p = 0.036). In the population taking DOACs at discharge, history of surgery (OR: 4.785, 95% CI: 1.255–18.242, p = 0.022) and multivessel disease (OR: 2.929, 95% CI: 1.041–8.246, p = 0.042) were identified as bleeding risk factors.

Risk factors for major bleeding events

An AST level > 50 U/L was identified as an independent risk factor for major bleeding events (OR: 3.917, 95% CI: 1.333–11.506, p = 0.013) (Additional file: Supplementary material 8).

Development and evaluation of the bleeding risk model

The predictive formula for the bleeding risk was created using age > 80 years, multivessel disease, history of surgery, low eGFR, anemia, and hypertension (Additional file: Supplementary material 4). There were no missing values for these factors. The integer scores determined using the ORs of these six factors were as follows: 1 point for eGFR 30–45 mL/min/1.73 m2; 1 point for age > 80 years; 1 point for multivessel disease; 1 point for hypertension; 1 point for anemia; 2 points for history of surgery; and 2 points for eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Table 3).

Table 3 Development of a bleeding risk model in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI
Full size table

The sum of the scores of the six factors (range: 0–8 points) was calculated for all patients. A plot of the observed and predicted endpoints against the scores was obtained for 134 patients. The patients were stratified into three groups based on the calculated scores (Fig. 1). When the three groups were compared, those with scores ≥ 5 had a significantly higher rate of bleeding events than those with scores ≤ 2 (73.3% vs. 13.9%; p < 0.001); therefore, a score ≤ 2 was stratified as low risk, 3–4 as moderate risk, and ≥ 5 as high risk. For the high-risk group, the specificity was 96% and the positive predictive value was 73%. The C-statistic for bleeding events in the developed risk model was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66–0.84; p < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Evaluation of the bleeding risk model for elderly patients with AF undergoing primary PCI. Sensitivity: 0.27; specificity: 0.96; positive predictive value: 0.73; negative predictive value: 0.75; cut-off: 5 points

Full size image

Association between antithrombotic use and bleeding events

The year-by-year trend of DAPT duration is shown in Fig. 2a. It was observed that the duration of DAPT tended to become shorter over time, with fewer patients receiving DAPT for 12 months compared to the beginning of the study. The duration of DAPT was not significantly associated with bleeding events (Fig. 2b). The dose of DOACs at discharge was not significantly associated with bleeding events (Additional file: Supplementary material 9). The rate of triple therapy was significantly higher in the group with bleeding events than in the group without bleeding events (Fig. 3a). There was a significant difference in bleeding event rates between risk groups in the triple therapy group, whereas there was no significant difference in bleeding event rates between risk groups in the dual therapy group (Fig. 3b). Triple therapy at the time of bleeding or at the end of observation was identified as an independent risk factor for bleeding events (OR: 4.211, 95% CI: 1.978–8.965, p < 0.001) (Additional file: Supplementary material 10).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship between year-to-year trends in concomitant use duration of triple anti-thrombotic therapy and bleeding events. a) Trends in duration of concomitant use of triple anti-thrombotic therapy by year of PCI. b) Relationship between duration of concomitant use of triple anti-thrombotic therapy and bleeding. Duration of concomitant use of triple antithrombotic therapy was collected at the end of follow-up. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between number of antithrombotic agents and bleeding events. a) Relationship between number of antithrombotic agents and bleeding events. b) Bleeding rates by number of antithrombotic agents and between bleeding risk models. The number of antithrombotic agents was investigated at the time of bleeding in the bleeding event group and at the end of observation in the without-bleeding event group. OAC, oral anticoagulant

Full size image

Discussion

We found that age over 80 years, multivessel disease, and history of surgery were independent risk factors of bleeding events for elderly patients with AF who underwent PCI. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify bleeding risk factors in an elderly population of patients with AF undergoing PCI. In addition, we found that the number of concomitant antithrombotic agents affects bleeding in elderly patients at high risk of bleeding. Bleeding events may be avoided by considering dual therapy after PCI in elderly patients at high risk of bleeding. Therefore, the results of this study may help to identify elderly patients at high risk of bleeding and assist in optimizing antithrombotic therapy to avoid bleeding events.

In the present study, patients older than 80 years exhibited a 2.5-fold higher risk of bleeding than those younger than 80 years. Older age was a consistent risk factor for bleeding events in previous studies [11]. The Japanese version of the high bleeding risk criteria also showed that the bleeding risk sharply increases at age 80 years and older [13]. Aging is associated with increased bleeding events because of decreased vascular elasticity, increased inflammatory cytokines, and increased comorbidities [17]. As populations age across the world, the number of very elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI is increasing [8]. However, many prospective clinical trials included only a small number of very elderly patients. As such, there is limited data on bleeding risk available in this population. Therefore, the results of our study have important clinical implications.

Further, we reported for the first time, to our knowledge, that multivessel disease is a risk factor for bleeding events in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI. Patients with multivessel disease as a result of long-term hypertension and diabetes [18, 19], which are risk factors for atherosclerosis, have a high incidence of myocardial infarction [20]. Multivessel disease is a risk factor that reflects the effects of long-term complications of arteriosclerosis, which has been reported as a risk factor for epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding [21, 22]. Therefore, it is believed that the association between multivessel disease and bleeding events reflects an increased risk of bleeding events because of the long-term complications of arteriosclerosis.

In this study, 42% of patients with a history of surgery had undergone gastrointestinal surgery and 29% had undergone surgery related to malignancy. Potential gastrointestinal bleeding with coexisting gastrointestinal disease or bleeding tendency caused by cancer-related anemia may affect the bleeding events associated with anticoagulant therapy [23,24,25]. Additionally, because coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated after surgery, the administration of antithrombotic drugs promotes the bleeding tendency [26]. Therefore, it was thought that the risk of bleeding was increased due to factors such as gastrointestinal disease, concomitant malignancy, and the activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic systems after surgery.

AST > 50 U/L was identified as a risk factor for major bleeding, which differed from the risk factors for BARC class ≥ 2 bleeding. This discrepancy was attributed to the fact that approximately 60% of patients who experienced a bleeding event in this study fell into class 2 of the BARC criteria. While previous studies on bleeding risk factors primarily focused on major bleeding as the primary endpoint, this study recognized the importance of identifying bleeding risk factors, including BARC class 2 events. Such events have significant implications for patients’ quality of life and readmission rates [27]. The bleeding risk factors identified in this study could predict not only major bleeding but also BARC class 2 bleeding events requiring clinical attention.

In the Credo-Kyoto study [28], a large cohort of Japanese patients undergoing PCI was included, and 74.8% of the patients were male. However, in this current study, the proportion of male participants was slightly higher at 82.8% (111 patients). It has been reported that males with AF tend to be older [15]. Therefore, the higher proportion of males in this study compared to the previous report may be attributed to the age distribution of the participants.

The particularly high risk of bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI is a clinical challenge. Therefore, optimizing antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI is important in clinical practice. The duration of triple antithrombotic therapy is being reduced to avoid the high bleeding risk associated with it [13]. On the other hand, some reports suggest that triple therapy after PCI is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, regardless of its duration [29]. A meta-analysis of large clinical trials involving patients with AF undergoing PCI revealed that dual therapy with an oral anticoagulant and P2Y12 inhibitor reduced bleeding events by 20–40% compared with triple therapy [30]. In this study, the rate of bleeding events was also higher with triple therapy than with dual therapy. In particular, a higher rate of bleeding events was seen in the high-risk group with triple therapy. Based on the above, in elderly patients at high risk of bleeding, dual therapy may be useful as an antithrombotic regimen after PCI. Our results may help to predict the risk of bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI and to plan treatment according to risk.

The present study identified multivessel disease as a risk factor for bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI. Although multivessel disease may reflect long-term complications of arteriosclerosis, the association between arteriosclerosis and bleeding has not been adequately investigated. Therefore, the association between findings of arteriosclerosis and bleeding in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI should be investigated in the future. In addition, in elderly patients at high risk of bleeding, the efficacy and safety of dual therapy should be investigated in future multicenter prospective trials.

Study limitations

This study had three main limitations. First, the follow-up period after PCI was 1 year, which might have resulted in the underestimation of actual long-term bleeding rates. However, the recommended duration for concomitant antiplatelet therapy for this patient population is a maximum of 1 year; therefore, the follow-up period was considered appropriate. Second, we did not collect information to directly assess atherosclerosis, such as intravascular ultrasound, cardio–ankle vascular index, ankle–brachial pressure index, or carotid ultrasound. These data may clarify why multivessel disease was identified as a risk factor for bleeding events. Similarly, information on polyvascular disease was not collected. Third, the developed risk model was not externally validated. The developed risk model will need to be validated in other populations in the future.

Conclusions

Age over 80 years, multivessel disease, and history of surgery were risk factors of bleeding events for elderly patients with AF who underwent PCI. In addition, the number of concomitant antithrombotic agents was found to affect bleeding. Elderly patients at high risk of bleeding may avoid bleeding events by considering dual therapy after PCI. These results may help to predict bleeding risk in elderly patients with AF undergoing PCI and to plan treatment according to risk.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

HMG-CoA:

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A

OAC:

Oral anticoagulant

DAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HbA1c:

Glycosylated hemoglobin

BARC:

Bleeding academic research consortium

DOACs:

Direct oral anticoagulants

CrCl:

Creatinine clearance

OR:

Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval

References

  1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:857–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kralev S, Schneider K, Lang S, Süselbeck T, Borggrefeet M. Incidence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time coronary angiography. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand SS, Yusuf S. Oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:2058–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aoki J, Kozuma K, Awata M, Nanasato M, Shiode N, Tanabe K, et al. Three-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post-marketing surveillance study of cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan. Circ J. 2016;80:906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stacy ZA, Richter SK. Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: treatment outcomes and dosing in special populations. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;12:247–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. van Rein N, Heide-Jørgensen U, Lijfering WM, Dekkers OM, Sørensen HT, Cannegieter SC. Major bleeding rates in atrial fibrillation patients on single, dual, or triple antithrombotic therapy. Circulation. 2019;139:775–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schäfer A, Flierl U, Bauersachs J. Anti-thrombotic strategies in elderly patients receiving platelet inhibitors. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6:57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohamed MO, Kirchhof P, Vidovich M, Savage M, Rashid M, Kwok CS, et al. Effect of concomitant atrial fibrillation on in-hospital outcomes of non-ST-elevation-acute coronary syndrome-related hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:465–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Généreux P, Giustino G, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Stuckey TD, Rinaldi MJ, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and impact of post-discharge bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1036–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo DJ, Byrne RA, Capodannoet D, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2019;140:240–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010;138:1093–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura M, Kimura K, Kimura T, Ishihara M, Otsuka F, Kozuma K, et al. JCS 2020 guideline focused update on antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2020;84:831–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. An Y, Ogawa H, Esato M, Ishii M, Iguchi M, Masunaga N, et al. Cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and anemia (from the Fushimi AF Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2020;134:74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vemulapalli S, Hellkamp AS, Jones WS, Piccini JP, Mahaffey KW, Becker RC, et al. Blood pressure control and stroke or bleeding risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET AF Trial. Am Heart J. 2016;178:74–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Capranzano P, Angiolillo DJ. Antithrombotic management of elderly patients with coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:723–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hegde SS, Mallesh P, Yeli SM, Gadad VM, Giri Punja M. Comparitive angiographic profile in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:MC07–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira JL, Hirata MH, Sousa AG, Gabriel FS, Hirata TD, Tavares Ida S, et al. Male gender and arterial hypertension are plaque predictors at coronary computed tomography angiography. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;104:409–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Moreno R, Rey JR, Cantalapiedra JL, Ortega A, Fernández-Portales J, López de Sá E, et al. Predictors of multivessel disease in cases of acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 1998;65:157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elwany S, Ibrahim AA, Soliman AI, Bazak R, Ibrahim HA. The significance of atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients with epistaxis. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:323–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto T, Watabe H, Yamada A, Hirata Y, Yoshida H, Koike K. The association between arteriosclerosis related diseases and diverticular bleeding. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:1161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adegboyega T, Rivadeneira D. Lower GI bleeding: an update on incidences and causes. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020;33:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Birgegård G, Aapro MS, Bokemeyer C, Dicato M, Drings P, Hornedo J, et al. Cancer-related anemia: pathogenesis, prevalence and treatment. Oncology. 2005;68(Suppl 1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Potts JE, Iliescu CA, Lopez Mattei JC, Martinez SC, Holmvang L, Ludman P, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in cancer patients: a report of the prevalence and outcomes in the United States. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1790–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Innerhofer P, Kienast J. Principles of perioperative coagulopathy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010;24:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vidula MK, McCarthy CP, Butala NM, Kennedy KF, Wasfy JH, Yeh RW, et al. Causes and predictors of early readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention among patients discharged on oral anticoagulant therapy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Yamaji K, Watanabe H, Yoshikawa Y, Shiomi H, et al. Prediction of thrombotic and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention: CREDO-Kyoto thrombotic and bleeding risk scores. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lamberts M, Olesen JB, Ruwald MH, Hansen CM, Karasoy D, Kristensen SL, et al. Bleeding after initiation of multiple antithrombotic drugs, including triple therapy, in atrial fibrillation patients following myocardial infarction and coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2012;126:1185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gargiulo G, Goette A, Tijssen J, Eckardt L, Lewalter T, Vranckx P, et al. Safety and efficacy outcomes of double vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-based randomized clinical trials. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3757–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Hiroyoshi Mori for helpful discussions and comments regarding the study results.

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan

    Kanako Fujita, Noriko Kohyama, Miki Sato, Tomokazu Deguchi & Mari Kogo

  2. Department of Pharmacy, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

    Kanako Fujita & Tomokazu Deguchi

  3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan

    Hiroshi Suzuki & Mio Ebato

Authors
  1. Kanako Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noriko Kohyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miki Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomokazu Deguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiroshi Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mio Ebato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mari Kogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. KF and NK performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. SM, TD, HS, ME, and MK performed interpretation of the data. KF wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanako Fujita.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Showa University School of Pharmacy, Japan (Approval No. 379 on June 11, 2020). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for obtaining informed consent was waived by the same Ethics Committee. The patients are informed that they are able to opt out from the use of their data for research purposes at the Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital’s website.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional File 1: Supplementary material 1 to 10.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujita, K., Kohyama, N., Sato, M. et al. Bleeding risk factors and real-world antithrombotic therapies in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 9, 41 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00308-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00308-8

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences

ISSN: 2055-0294

Contact us