Skip to main content

Reinforcement of pimobendan with guideline-directed medical therapy may reduce the rehospitalization rates in patients with heart failure: retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Pimobendan reportedly improves the subjective symptoms of heart failure. However, evidence of improved prognosis is lacking. This study aimed to determine whether reinforcing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) improved rehospitalization rates for worsening heart failure in patients administered pimobendan.

Methods

A total of 175 patients with heart failure who were urgently admitted to our hospital for worsening heart failure and who received pimobendan between January 2015 and February 2022 were included. Of the 175 patients, 44 were excluded because of in-hospital death at the time of pimobendan induction. The remaining 131 patients were divided into two groups, the reduced ejection fraction (rEF) (n = 93) and non-rEF (n = 38) groups, and further divided into the GDMT-reinforced and non-reinforced groups.

Results

In patients with rEF, the rate of rehospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower in the GDMT-reinforced group than in the non-reinforced group (log-rank test, P = .04). However, the same trend was not observed in the non-rEF group.

Conclusions

Reinforcing GDMT may reduce the heart failure rehospitalization rate in patients with pimobendan administration and rEF. However, multicenter collaborative research is needed.

Trial registration

IRB Approval by the Nippon Medical School Hospital Ethics Committee B-2021-433 (April 10, 2023).

Background

Heart failure is a global epidemic characterized by high prevalence and mortality rates [1, 2]. Rapid advancements have been made in drug therapy for heart failure in recent years, and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)-including β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is strongly recommended. However, few patients receive adequate treatment in accordance with GDMT [3]. The low induction rate of GDMT may be due to various reasons, including patients’ intolerance to the introduction or escalation of drug therapy, renal impairment, hypotension, bradycardia, dehydration, and noncompliance. Pimobendan, a drug known for leading to improvements in subjective symptoms in heart failure patients, lacks evidence supporting its efficacy in improving prognosis, such as reducing rehospitalization rates due to exacerbation of heart failure, Pimobendan functions primarily by inhibiting phosphodiesterase (PDE) III, which produces inotropic effects independent of β-receptor mediation. The Ca-sensitizing effect of pimobendan produces inotropic effects without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption [4, 5]. In practice, there are a certain number of heart failure patients taking pimobendan, and the clinical question remains whether strengthening GDMT improves heart failure rehospitalization rates [6, 7]. In this study, we used single-center registry data to determine whether intensifying GDMT in patients with severe heart failure receiving pimobendan would reduce rehospitalization rates.

Methods

Study design and data collection

This single-site cohort study was based on information extracted from the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) database of the Nippon Medical School Hospital. The following data were extracted: patient age and sex, primary diagnoses and comorbidities, diagnoses and treatments, medications and devices used, discharge status, and post-discharge outcomes. Diagnoses were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10). Laboratory data, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic parameters were collected electronically from the medical records. Data were anonymized and not used to identify individuals. As a result, patient consent was not required. This study was conducted after obtaining permission from the Ethics Committee of the Nippon Medical School Hospital (B-2021-433).

Patient selection and evaluation

The inclusion period was from January 2015 to February 2022. The inclusion criteria were urgent admission to our hospital for heart failure and treatment with pimobendan. The exclusion criterion was in-hospital death at the time of pimobendan induction. Following the current guidelines, β-blocker or MRA reinforcement refers to patients in whom β-blocker or MRA was increased after pimobendan induction. First, we divided the patients into two groups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction during hospitalization to evaluate the clinical characteristics and readmission rates: the reduced ejection fraction (rEF) and non-rEF (midrange [mr] EF and preserved [p] EF) groups. Second, we further divided the rEF and non-rEF groups into two groups according to the GDMT reinforcement and non-reinforcement (supplemental Figure). Finally, we identified independent factors associated with lower readmission rates. The rEF group was defined as patients with as an EF < 40%, and the non-rEF group was defined as those with an EF ≥ 40% in the echocardiographic evaluation at the time of pimobendane induction.

Outcomes

The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of rehospitalization due to heart failure within 1 year, defined as readmission with a primary diagnosis of heart failure according to the ICD-10 codes. The secondary endpoint was the Cox univariate model for heart failure rehospitalization within 1 year in the heart failure group.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages and compared among the groups using the Chi-squared test. Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges. Heart failure readmission rates were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with lower readmission rates. Two-sided P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and the R software version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

A total of 175 patients with heart failure who were urgent admitted to our hospital for worsening heart failure and received pimobendan between January 2015 and February 2022 were included in the study. Of the 175 patients, 44 were excluded from this study due to in-hospital deaths at the time of pimobendan induction. The remaining 131 patients were divided into two groups: the rEF group (n = 93) and the non-rEF group (n = 38), and further divided into the GDMT-reinforced and non-reinforced groups (Table 1, Supplemental Figure). In the rEF group, the GDMT-reinforced group was younger than the non-reinforced group, had a higher MRA induction rate, and had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), at admission and discharge and Hb at admission. In the non-rEF group, the GDMT-reinforced group had a higher β-blocker and PPI induction rate than the non-reinforced group.

Table 1 Background data of patients in the four groups

Post-discharge readmission for heart failure

The rehospitalization rate for heart failure within 1 year was significantly lower in the GDMT-reinforced rEF group than in the non-reinforced rEF group (log-rank test, P = .04) (Fig. 1). Univariate Cox regression analysis identified β-blocker use or MRA reinforcement as factors independently associated with the 1-year readmission rate (Table 2). No significant factors were identified in the multivariate analysis, included of sex, age, eGFR, and GDMT reinforcement (Table 2). β-blocker or MRA reinforcement refers to patients in whom β-blocker or MRA was increased after pimobendan induction. In contrast, there were no significant differences between the GDMT-reinforced and non-reinforced groups in the non-rEF group (log-rank test, P = .22) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan Meier curves showing heart failure readmission-free survival in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-rEF (heart failure with midrange (mr)EF and preserved (p)EF) groups

Table 2 Cox univariate and multivariate model for heart failure rehospitalization within 1 year in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction group

Adverse events associated with discontinuation or dose reduction of pimobendan

Among the study patients in the combined rEF and non-rEF groups, the incidence of cardiovascular-related adverse events was 6.9%: six cases of ventricular tachycardia, one case of ventricular fraction-related death, one case of atrial tachycardia, and one case of hypotension. The rate of sudden death from ventricular arrhythmias was one case (0.76%, n = 1) in the rEF group.

Discussion

This study investigated the usefulness of GDMT reinforcement in patients treated with pimobendan, rather than evaluating the efficacy of pimobendan. This study showed that, in patients receiving pimobendan, the rate of heart failure rehospitalization was reduced by reinforcement with GDMT after pimobendan induction in the rEF group. In addition, reinforcement of β-blockers or MRA was identified as a factor influencing the reduction in heart failure rehospitalization in the rEF group, but not multivariate analysis. In contrast, age, albumin at discharge, eGFR, and Hb were not. GDMT did not impact rehospitalization rates for heart failure in the non-rEF group. Both Pimobendan in Congestive Heart Failure (PICO) trial and Effects of Pimobendan on Chronic Heart Failure (EPOCH) study, which were multicenter studies investigating the efficacy of pimobendan, did not include patients using MRA. Additionally, the number of patients using β-blockers was low (22.5% of all patients in the EPOCH study and none of the patients in the PICO trial) [6, 7]. Our study is novel in this respect as we evaluated reinforcement with GDMT in patients receiving pimobendan.

Unlike other inotropic drugs, pimobendan exhibits inotropic effects that are not mediated by β-receptors [8]. As such, this drug is thought to be compatible with β-blockers, and some reports support the safe administration of β-blockers in patients with heart failure [9,10,11]. Furthermore, the benefit of MRAs in patients with heart failure has been demonstrated in a randomized aldactone evaluation study (RALES) trial, and pimobendan may reduce heart failure rehospitalization rates by enabling MRA induction [12]. The increase in circulating plasma volume after pimobendan induction may increase the tolerability of MRA induction and dose escalation. Pimobendan has also been reported to improve myocardial diastolic dysfunction [13, 14].

Although there have been reports of arrhythmia-related side effects associated with pimobendan, such as in the Prospective Randomized Milrinone Survival Evaluation (PROMISE) study, which found that PDE III inhibitors may induce arrhythmias, there were no such reports from the PICO trial, the EPOCH study, or other reports [4, 15,16,17]. In the present study, the rate of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias was 0.76%, suggesting that pimobendan had a negligible effect on lethal arrhythmias.

This study demonstrates that in patients receiving pimobendan, the heart failure rehospitalization rate was reduced by reinforcement with GDMT after pimobendan induction in the rEF group, but not in the non-rEF group.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the single-center DPC database design may have introduced selection bias. Second, the study did not include patients who were administered SGLT2 inhibitors and the rate of introduction of ARNI was low, indicating a low rate of introduction of the latest GDMTs as they were not adopted in our hospital during the study period. Third, patients who received pimobendan were more likely to have severe heart failure. It is possible that patients with a poor prognosis were initially included in the study.

Conclusion

In patients with rEF, the rate of rehospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower in the GDMT-reinforced than nonreinforced group, but not in the non-rEF group. Multicenter collaborative research is therefore needed.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ARNI:

angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor

DPC:

diagnosis procedure combination

eGFR:

estimated glomerular filtration rate

EPOCH:

Effects of Pimobendan on Chronic Heart Failure

GDMT:

guideline-directed medical therapy

Hb:

hemoglobin

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases 10th revision

MRA:

mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

PDE:

phosphodiesterase

PICO:

Pimobendan in Congestive Heart Failure

PROMISE:

Prospective Randomized Milrinone Survival Evaluation

RALES:

randomized aldactone evaluation study

rEF:

reduced ejection fraction

SGLT2:

sodium glucose cotransporter-2

References

  1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones NR, Roalfe AK, Adoki I, Hobbs FDR, Taylor CJ. Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21:1306–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Savarese G, Kishi T, Vardeny O, Adamsson Eryd S, Bodegård J, Lund LH, et al. Heart failure drug Treatment-Inertia, Titration, and discontinuation: a multinational observational study (EVOLUTION HF). JACC Heart Fail. 2023;11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2022.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann A, Boldt J, Kirchner J. The role of Ca++-sensitizers for the treatment of heart failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:337–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200310000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Du CK, Morimoto S, Nishii K, Minakami R, Ohta M, Tadano N, et al. Knock-in mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy caused by troponin mutation. Circ Res. 2007;101:185–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.106.146670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Effects of pimobendan on. Adverse cardiac events and physical activities in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure: the effects of pimobendan on chronic heart failure study (EPOCH study). Circ J. 2002;66:149–57. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.66.149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubsen J, Just H, Hjalmarsson AC, La Framboise D, Remme WJ, Heinrich-Nols J, et al. Effect of pimobendan on exercise capacity in patients with heart failure: main results from the Pimobendan in Congestive Heart failure (PICO) trial. Heart. 1996;76:223–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Endoh M. Mechanisms of action of novel cardiotonic agents. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2002;40:323–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-200209000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar A, Choudhary G, Antonio C, Just V, Jain A, Heaney L, et al. Carvedilol titration in patients with congestive heart failure receiving inotropic therapy. Am Heart J. 2001;142:512–15. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.117605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murai K, Seino Y, Kimata N, Inami T, Murakami D, Abe J, et al. Efficacy and limitations of oral inotropic agents for the treatment of chronic heart failure. Int Heart J. 2013;54:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.54.75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshikawa T, Baba A, Suzuki M, Yokozuka H, Okada Y, Nagami K, et al. Effectiveness of carvedilol alone versus carvedilol + pimobendan for severe congestive heart failure. For the Keio Interhospital Cardiology Study (KICS) group. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1495–7. a7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00803-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized aldactone evaluation study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:709–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909023411001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Monrad ES, McKay RG, Baim DS, Colucci WS, Fifer MA, Heller GV, et al. Improvement in indexes of diastolic performance in patients with congestive heart failure treated with milrinone. Circulation. 1984;70:1030–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.70.6.1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jörgensen K, Bech-Hanssen O, Houltz E, Ricksten SE. Effects of levosimendan on left ventricular relaxation and early filling at maintained preload and afterload conditions after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2008;117:1075–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.722868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagemeijer F. Calcium sensitization with pimobendan: pharmacology, haemodynamic improvement, and sudden death in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:551–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/14.4.551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergler-Klein J, Globits S, Stefenelli T, Mayr H, Porenta G, Sochor H, et al. [Pimobendan (UDCG 115 BS) in long-term therapy of chronic heart failure]. Z Kardiol. 1992;81:546–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Packer M, Carver JR, Rodeheffer RJ, Ivanhoe RJ, DiBianco R, Zeldis SM, et al. Effect of oral milrinone on mortality in severe chronic heart failure. The PROMISE Study Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1468–75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199111213252103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their sincere thanks to all the people who have been involved in patient care, including emergency staff, technicians, medical engineers, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, and surgeons at Nippon Medical School Hospital.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YI conceived the study and YK designed the study. YI and TN performed data collection and TN conducted statistical analyses. YI and YK drafted the original manuscript. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiaki Kubota.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

IRB Approval by the Nippon Medical School Hospital Ethics Committee B-2021-433.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iwade, Y., Kubota, Y., Hayashi, D. et al. Reinforcement of pimobendan with guideline-directed medical therapy may reduce the rehospitalization rates in patients with heart failure: retrospective cohort study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 10, 24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00346-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-024-00346-w

Keywords