- Short report
- Open Access
Efficacy of prolonged tapered and pulsed vancomycin regimen on recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in the Japanese setting: a case control study
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciencesvolume 5, Article number: 19 (2019)
According to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile, oral vancomycin is to be used in vancomycin tapered and pulsed regimen (VCM-TP) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). However, data on the efficacy of VCM-TP in Japanese patients with recurrent CDI are scarce. To address this gap, we investigated the efficacy of VCM-TP and performed a case-controlled study to assess the risk factors associated with treatment failure in these patients.
We conducted this study on all patients who were administered VCM-TP for recurrent episodes of CDI between January 2008 and December 2018 at Tosei General Hospital. All patients had documented follow-ups within 90 days after completion of the VCM-TP. Data were obtained for comparative analysis of treatment success or failure. Thirty-six patients were eligible for this study, and treatment success was documented in 23 patients (63.9%) following VCM-TP treatment. Treatment success was documented in 22 of 30 (73.3%) patients who received the recommended therapy according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines. The frequency of patients treated with the recommended therapy was higher in the treatment success group (95.7%) than in the treatment failure group (61.5%) (OR: 13.75, 95% CI: 1.39–136.39, p = 0.016). Vancomycin-resistant enterococci culture tests were performed in 20 patients (55.6%), and all results were negative.
Our findings suggest that VCM-TP is a good therapeutic option for recurrent CDI in Japanese patients. Furthermore, administration of the recommended VCM-TP is important for achieving a high rate of treatment success. Hence, antimicrobial stewardship teams should support the implementation of recommended VCM-TPs.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the nosocomial infections associated with poor outcome [1, 2] and involves a huge medical expense [3, 4]. The 30-day mortality rate associated with CDI is 8%–31% , and the rate of recurrence is 16%–24% despite successful treatment of the initial episode . After the first episode of recurrence, the rate of second CDI recurrence is 22.6%–41.8 , and the medical expenditure in patients with recurrent CDI is higher than that in patients with non-recurrent CDI . According to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), oral vancomycin should be used in a vancomycin tapered and pulsed regimen (VCM-TP) for a standard 10-day course to treat the initial episode of CDI . The Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases recommend using VCM-TP for the first or for ≥2 recurrence of CDI as an alternative therapy . Despite reports of the efficacy of VCM-TP for recurrent CDI [11, 12], data on Japanese patients with recurrent CDI remain scarce. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of VCM-TP in Japanese patients with recurrent CDI and performed a case-controlled study to assess the risk factors associated with treatment failure from recurrent CDI.
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Tosei General Hospital (receipt No. 769). This study was conducted on all patients who were administered VCM-TP for recurrent episodes of CDI (defined as symptoms of re-infection within 8 weeks of the prior episode) between January 2008 and December 2018 at Tosei General Hospital, a 633-bedded hospital. VCM-TP was defined as tapering vancomycin administration frequency in the sequence of once daily (pulse phase), and then every other day or every third day dosing for at least 2 weeks . All patients had at least one of their prior CDI episodes confirmed by a positive test for the C. difficile toxin in their stool. For detecting the toxin, lateral flow immunoassay was performed in the stool specimens using Uniquick (Kanto Kagaku Kanto Kagaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo from January 2008 to June 2011), X/pect toxin A/B (Kanto Kagaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo from July 2011 to September 2014) and C. Diff Quik Chek Complete (Alere Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo from October 2014 to December 2018).
Efficacy of VCM-TP
All patients were followed up for more than 90 days after completion of VCM-TP. Treatment success was defined as the non-recurrence of diarrheal symptoms that require re-treatment with a CDI-specific agent . Some patients noted a transient recurrence of symptoms near the end or just after completion of the pulse phase of the VCM-TP, and it resolved spontaneously, usually within a day; these episodes were not considered as recurrent CDI . We investigated the treatment success rate in all patients with VCM-TP, in patients following the recommended VCM-TP according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines (125 mg four times per day for 10–14 days, two times per day for a week, once per day for a week, and every 2 or 3 days for 2–8 weeks) , and in patients following inappropriate VCM-TP therapy, which is defined as VCM-TP that departs from the recommended therapy.
Factors associated with treatment failure in the administration of VCM-TP
The following data were obtained for comparative analysis of treatment success or failure: age, sex, underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior abdominal surgery, gastroesophageal reflux, immunocompromised, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and malignancy according to Sirbu et al. ), number of CDI episodes, duration of treatment, Charlson comorbidity index, drug use (proton pump inhibitors, histamine receptor-2 blockers, probiotics, antidiarrheals, and antibiotic use 90 days prior to the treatment), concomitant antibiotic use with VCM-TP treatment, disease severity (according to the Zar criteria and the MN criteria [14, 15]), and recommended VCM-TP according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci during or after VCM-TP
Stool culture tests for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were performed between 14 days after initiation and 90 days after completion of VCM-TP to confirm the presence of VRE. The BD Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Selective Agar (Becton Dickinson©, NJ, USA) was used to detect VRE, and Microscan Walkaway system (Beckman Coulter, California, USA) was used to identify VRE at the species level and to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. All cultures were considered resistant according to the breakpoints defined by the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (M100 S-22).
The qualitative and stratified continuous variables were compared using Fisher Exact test or Pearson χ2 test. The continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. The predictive values are presented as the odds ratios (ORs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two-tailed p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM®).
Efficacy of VCM-TP
The study included 38 consecutive patients treated with VCM-TP for recurrent CDI. Two patients who died from unrelated disease before completing their regimens were excluded from the analysis. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the included patients. Among the remaining 36 patients, the median number of CDI episodes was 3 (range, 2–7). Twenty-nine patients were male, and the median age was 80.5 years. The median duration of treatment was 43 (IQR, 36.8–55) days. Treatment success occurred in 23 of 36 (63.9%) patients following VCM-TP and in 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) following the recommended therapy. On the contrary, in patients with inappropriate therapy, treatment success occurred in 1 of 6 patients (16.7%), which is less than the success rate of those following the recommended therapy (p = 0.016) (Fig. 1).
Factors associated with treatment failure after administration of VCM-TP
Table 2 shows the comparative characteristics of patients in the treatment success and failure groups. The proportion of patients treated with the recommended therapy was higher in the treatment success group than in the treatment failure group (OR: 13.75, 95% CI: 1.39–136.39, p = 0.016). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups. The reasons for inappropriate use of VCM-TP in treatment failure patients were the inability of the patients to take vancomycin two times a day for a week (3 cases) and unnecessary washout period during treatment (2 cases).
Detection of VRE during or after VCM-TP
VRE culture was performed in 20 patients (55.6%) after 41.9 ± 17.7 (mean ± standard deviation) days of VCM-TP treatment initiation, and all were negative.
VCM-TP is recommended for the treatment of recurrent CDI, but a few studies have evaluated the efficacy of VCM-TP in Japanese patients with recurrent CDI. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of VCM-TP in Japanese patients with recurrent CDI and performed a case-controlled study to assess the risk factors associated with treatment failure from recurrent CDI.
VCM-TP for recurrent CDI resulted in clinical improvement in 63.9% of all patients, and 73.3% of patients under the recommended therapy had clinical improvements (Fig. 1). McFarland et al. and Sirbu et al. reported the cure rate of recurrent CDI with VCM-TP as 69.0% (20/29 cases) and 74.0% (74/100 cases), respectively [11, 13]. Therefore, the effects of the recommended VCM-TP therapy in Japanese patients are similar to its effects in non-Japanese patients. Furthermore, our results showed that inappropriate VCM-TP therapy, following unconventional guidelines, can increase the treatment failure rate (Fig. 1, Table 2). Mcfarland et al. hypothesized that the recommended VCM-TP allows gradual weeding out of C. difficile spores from the intestinal reservoir, resulting in low recurrence rate when pulsed doses of vancomycin are administered over an extended period (usually 3 weeks). Hence, we considered that inappropriate VCM-TP is more likely to result in treatment failure than recommended VCM-TP because C. difficile spores are not completely removed due to interruptions in treatment.
Repetitive cycles of antibiotic-free periods and antibiotic pulses may be an effective strategy for treating recurrent CDI . We consider that inappropriate therapy that violates the optimal schedule can lead to unnecessary VCM washout periods, thereby increasing the risk of regrowth and relapse of CDI. Accordingly, antimicrobial stewardship teams should implement the recommended VCM-TP.
Tomas et al. reported that alterations to the indigenous microbiota responsible for colonization resistance to C. difficile and VRE persist during and after completion of tapering courses of vancomycin . However, in our study, VRE was not detected in 20 patients in whom the VRE culture test was performed 41.9 days after treatment initiation. As our clinical data were limited, further studies in this regard are warranted.
There are certain limitations to this study. First, although our study was retrospective and observational, it only involved single-institutional data, and the sample size was inadequate. Additional prospective studies or clinical trials in multiple centers with larger numbers of patients are warranted. Second, it was difficult to confirm whether recurrent CDI was caused by the same C. difficile strain. The recurrence rate of CDI by the same bacterial strain is 45.8%–83.0% [17, 18]. Furthermore, if recurrent CDI was caused by the same bacterial strain, determining the specific cause is difficult considering the environmental factors or colonization in the intestinal tract.
Our findings suggest that VCM-TP can be a good therapeutic option for recurrent CDI in Japanese settings. Administration of the recommended VCM-TP is important to ensure a high rate of treatment success. Hence, antimicrobial stewardship teams should support the implementation of recommended VCM-TPs.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection
Vancomycin tapered and pulsed-dose regimen
Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Phatharacharukul P, Mahaparn P, Bruminhent J. High mortality risk in chronic kidney disease and end stage kidney disease patients with Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nat Sci. 2015;1:e85.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nearly half a million Americans suffered from Clostridium difficile infections in a single year. 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2015/p0225-clostridium-difficile.html. Accessed 21 Mar 2019.
Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Hashimoto H, Matsuda S, Fushimi K. The burden of Clostridium difficile-associated disease following digestive tract surgery in Japan. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82:175–80.
Fukuda H, Yano T, Shimono N. Inpatient expenditures attributable to hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection: a nationwide case-control study in Japan. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36:1367–76.
Abou Chakra CN, Pepin J, Sirard S, Valiquette L. Risk factors for recurrence, complications and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98400.
Reveles KR, Mortensen EM, Koeller JM, Lawson KA, Pugh MJV, Rumbellow SA, et al. Derivation and validation of a Clostridium difficile infection recurrence prediction rule in a national cohort of veterans. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38:349–56.
Pepin J, Routhier S, Gagnon S, Brazeau I. Management and outcomes of a first recurrence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Quebec. Canada Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:758–64.
Kunishima H, Ito K, Laurent T, Abe M. Healthcare burden of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in Japan: a retrospective database study. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24:892–901.
McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:987–94.
The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infections. Tokyo: Kyorinsha; 2018.
McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1769–75.
Majors D, Ellis P. Risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infections and strategies to decrease readmissions in a community hospital. Hosp Pharm. 2015;50:1003–10.
Sirbu BD, Soriano MM, Manzo C, Lum J, Gerding DN, Johnson S. Vancomycin taper and pulse regimen with careful follow-up for patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1396–9.
Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:302–7.
Yamagishi Y, Hagihara M, Hiroshige M. Evaluation of newly developed Clostridium difficile infection severity scoring system "MN criteria" for Clostridium difficile infection patients in Japan. Journal of Japanese Association for Anaerobic Infection Research. 2017;47:66–75.
Tomas ME, Mana TSC, Wilson BM, Nerandzic MM, Joussef-Piña S, Quiñones-Mateu ME, et al. Tapering courses of oral vancomycin induce persistent disruption of the microbiota that provide colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02237–17.
Figueroa I, Johnson S, Sambol SP, Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Gerding DN. Relapse versus reinfection: recurrent Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(Suppl 2):S104–9.
Durovic A, Widmer AF, Frei R, Tschudin-Sutter S. Distinguishing Clostridium difficile recurrence from reinfection: independent validation of current recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:891–6.
We thank all clinicians of the antimicrobial stewardship team at the Tosei General Hospital.
There are no funding sources for this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Tosei General Hospital (receipt no. 769) and was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The identities of the study subjects were kept confidential during data collection.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.