Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of the efficacy of drug treatment based on measurement of the oxidative stress, using reactive oxygen metabolites and biological antioxidant potential, in children with autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences volume 6, Article number: 8 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder, mainly characterized by impairment of social communication and restricted interests. ASD is frequently accompanied by attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is characterized by carelessness, hyperactivity and impulsivity (ASD/ADHD). It has been suggested that ASD and ADHD are associated with oxidative stress, that is, that patients with ASD/ADHD are in a state of increased oxidative stress. There are currenr tly no objective or biological test criteria for evaluating the efficacy of drug therapy in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether oxidative stress markers [serum reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs) levels and biological antioxidant potential (BAP)] can be used as objective indicators for evaluating the efficacy of drug treatment in ASD/ADHD patients.

Methods

The subjects of this study subjects were 50 Japanese patients with ASD/ADHD aged 4 to 14 years old. Serum samples were obtained from the patients to measure the serum levels of d-ROMs and the serum BAP. The study subjects were divided into two age groups: preschool children (4 to 6 years old) and school-age children (7 to 14 years old), and the serum levels of d-ROMs, serum BAP, serum BAP/d-ROMs ratio (hereinafter, the prefix serum will be dropped), and scores on the Parent-interview ASD Rating Scales-Text Revision (PARS-TR) and ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) were determined before and after drug therapy and compared between the two groups. In addition, changes in the d-ROMs, BAP and BAP/d-ROMs ratio and changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS after treatment were also analyzed.

Results

Significant decrease of the d-ROMs, BAP, and scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS, with a significant increase of the BAP/d-ROMs ratio, was observed after treatment. In addition, a significant correlation was observed between the changes in the d-ROMs and changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS after treatment in the school-age ASD/ADHD children.

Conclusion

Our results suggest the possibility that the serum level of d-ROMs may be useful as an objective assessment marker to supplement the subjective assessment of the effects of drug treatment in school-age children with ASD/ADHD.

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder, mainly characterized by impairments in social communication and interpersonal interactions, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. In the 5th version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [1], revised in 2013, the diagnostic label was changed from pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) to ASD. The DSM-5 formally recognizes the coexistence (ASD/ADHD) of ASD and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is characterized by carelessness, hyperactivity and impulsivity [1]. In recent years, the prevalence of ASD/ADHD has been on the rise [2], and it has been reported that approximately 80% of ASD patients who visit medical institutions are concomitantly diagnosed as also having ADHD [3]. Patients with ASD/ADHD, as compared with those with ASD or ADHD alone, have been reported to show lower adaptability and a higher degree of stress in daily life, and to have a poorer quality of life [4, 5]. In addition, it has also been reported that the risk of secondary disorders, such as anxiety and mood disorders, is elevated in patients with ASD/ADHD [6]. Therefore, drug therapy is selected depending on the individual patient’s condition; however, there are no objective or biological test criteria to evaluate the efficacy of drug therapy in these patients.

Neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and ADHD have been suggested to be associated with oxidative stress [7,8,9,10] and many oxidative stress markers such as superoxide dismutase, nitric oxide synthase, xanthine oxidase, glutathione S-transferase and paraoxonase-1 have been reported [7, 8, 10, 11]. However, these markers cannot be measured immediately in clinical practice because of the need for specialized equipment and cannot be used comprehensively to assess stress in vivo. On the other hand, d-ROMs and BAP are regarded as comprehensive biological markers of stress [12]. Furthermore, the measurement can be performed using the same sample and test equipment, and the measurement method is a simple procedure in about 5 min for each test. For these reasons we focused on d-ROMs and BAP. We proposed that these oxidative stress markers could be used as objective indicators in the assessment of stress in children [13]. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the serum levels of d-ROMs and the serum BAP, as oxidative stress markers, can be used as objective indicators for evaluating the efficacy of drug treatment in children with ASD/ADHD.

Methods

Study subjects

The study subjects were 50 Japanese patients (38 males and 12 females) with ASD/ADHD aged 4 to 14 years old, who had never received any drug treatment intervention. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in the study were patients diagnosed as having ASD/ADHD according to DSM-5-based assessment and clinical symptoms documented by a pediatric neurologist. Patients with underlying diseases other than developmental disorders, and those taking drugs for purposes other than the treatment of ASD or ADHD or than improvement in the symptoms were excluded. In our previous study, younger children had higher oxidative stress levels [13]. And it has been reported that the stress level of children differs due to changes in the environment between preschool and school life [14]. In consideration of the impact of age and stress from the living environment, the study subjects were divided into two groups by age: preschool children (4 to 6 years old) and school-age children (7 to 14 years old).

Measurement items

Indicator of oxidative stress (d-ROMs test)

The d-ROMs test is used to measure the serum levels of hydroperoxide. Hydroperoxide is a metabolite generated when proteins, lipids, amino acids, nucleotides, etc., are oxidized by active oxygen or free radicals, and generates free radicals in the presence of metal ions. Therefore, measurement of the hydroperoxide levels in the serum reflects the degree of biological oxidative stress. U.CARR is used for the unit, and 1 U.CARR is equivalent to the H2O2 of 0.08 mg/dL.

Indicator of antioxidant capacity (BAP test)

The BAP test is used to measure the degree to which ferric iron can be reduced to ferrous iron by the antioxidants contained in the blood. Measurement of the reducing ability as a blocking effect against the peroxidation chain reaction induced by reactive oxygen species or free radicals allows assessment of the antioxidant capacity, which is the ability to scavenge free radicals in the body. Μmol/L is used for the unit.

Measurement method

Between November 2016 and September 2019, blood samples were collected from the subjects prior to the start of treatment. Within one year after the start of the drug treatment, blood samples were collected again. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1469 g for 10 min, to obtain serum samples. The d-ROMs and BAP were measured using FREE CARRIO DUO (Diacron International, Grosseto, Italy), a free radical analyzer.

d-ROMs

First, each serum sample (20 μL) was placed in a cuvette filled with a pH 4.8-buffer that had been warmed in an incubator for at least 15 min. Then, the cuvette was gently overturned and mixed to allow Fe2+ and Fe3+ separation from the blood proteins. Fe2+ and Fe3+ act as catalyzers, and result in the degradation of blood hydroperoxide into an alkoxy radical and a peroxy radical. N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (20 μL) was then placed in the cuvette as a color-developing chromogen, resulting in the oxidation of the chromogen substrate by the free radicals to yield a red-colored radical cation. The cuvette was again overturned and mixed, then placed in a spectrophotometer to measure the radical cations at 505 nm.

BAP

50 μL of a chromogenic reagent (containing Fe3+) for BAP was added to a cuvette to induce red coloration, and the contents were mixed by inversion of the cuvette, followed by spectrophotometric measurement of the coloration. Then, each serum sample (10 μL) was placed into the cuvette and mixed. The cuvette was then placed in a thermostat to allow reaction in the mixture. Finally, the cuvette was placed in a spectrophotometer for measurements at 505 nm.

Investigation items

Parent-interview ASD rating scales–text. Revision (PARS-TR)

PARS-TR is a rating scale used to assess the presence or absence of developmental and behavioral symptoms of ASD and their severity, through interviewing the mothers (or other primary caregivers, if it is difficult to obtain information from the mothers) of the patients. In this study, a pediatric neurologist scored the rating scale. The minimum eligible age for assessment by PARS-TR is 3 years. The scale consists of 57 items classified into 6 subscales: interpersonal relations, communication, obsession, stereotyped behaviors, difficulty in living, and hypersensitivity (34 items for preschoolers, 33 items for school-age children, and 33 items for adolescence and adulthood). The severity of each item is rated on a 3-point scale (0, 1 and 2). The higher the total score, the more likely that the assessee child has ASD.

ADHD rating scale (ADHD-RS)

ADHD-RS is a rating scale used to assess the presence or absence of ADHD symptoms and their severity through interviewing people around the patients. In this assessment, information is obtained from the mothers (or other primary caregivers, if it is difficult to obtain information from the mothers) of the subjects. In this study, a pediatric neurologist scored the rating scale. The minimum eligible age for assessment by ADHD-RS is 5 years. The scale consists of 18 items in total: 9 items related to inattention and 9 items related to hyperactivity/impulsivity. The severity of each item is evaluated on a 4-point scale (0, 1, 2 and 3). The higher the total score, the more likely the assessee child has ADHD.

Statistical analysis

The d-ROMs, BAP and BAP/d-ROMs ratio, and the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS were compared before and after drug treatment using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with the level of significance (p value) set at 0.05. In addition, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and p-values were calculated, with the level of significance set at 0.05, to examine the correlations between the pre- and post-treatment changes in the d-ROMs, BAP and BAP/d-ROMs ratio and the pre- and post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS. The statistical analysis software used was R (version 3.6.1).

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the study subjects. The mean age was 8.64 ± 2.46 years, with the minimum and maximum ages of 4 and 14 years. In regard to the sex distribution, males accounted for 76.0% of all the study subjects, and also for the majority of subjects in both the groups of preschool and school-age children. The number of treatment drugs used in the study subjects was 11 for ASD/ADHD, and the most commonly prescribed drug was guanfacine hydrochloride, which was used in a half of all the subjects. Table 2 shows the pre- to post-treatment changes in each of the measurement items in the study subjects. Significant decreases of the d-ROMs and BAP, and in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS, with a significant increase in the BAP/d-ROMs ratio, were observed in all the subjects after treatment. The preschool children showed a significant decrease of both the d-ROMs and the score on the PARS-TR after treatment. On the other hand, the school-age children showed significant decreases of the d-ROMs, BAP and the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS, with a significant increase of the BAP/d-ROMs ratio, after treatment. Table 3 shows the relationships between the pre- to post-treatment changes in the d-ROMs, BAP and BAP/d-ROMs ratio, and the pre- to post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS. Significant correlations were observed in all the subjects between the pre- to post-treatment changes in the d-ROMs and the pre- to post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR (r = 0.34, P = 0.02) and ADHD-RS (r = 0.29, P = 0.04). Figure 1 shows the relationship between the pre- to post-treatment changes in the serum d-ROMs and the pre- to post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS in the preschool and school-age children. In the school-age children, significant correlations were observed between the pre- to post-treatment change in the d-ROMs and pre- to post-treatment change in the scores on the PARS-TR (r = 0.39, P = 0.01) and ADHD-RS (r = 0.44, P = 0.004). On the other hand, in the preschool children, no significant correlations were observed for any of the items.

Table 1 Background of subjects
Full size table
Table 2 The pre- to post-treatment changes in objective markers and subjective scores
Full size table
Table 3 Correlation between change in objective markers and changes in subjective scores
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Relationship between change in PARS-TR and ADHD-RS scores and change in d-ROMs levels. 1A = Relationship between change in PARS-TR score and change in d-ROMs levels. In the 7-14 years group, there was a significant correlation between the change in the d-ROMs value and the change in the PARS-TR score. (r = 0.39, p = 0.01), but not in the 4–6 years group. 1B = Relationship between change in ADHD-RS score and change in d-ROMs levels. In the 7-14 years group, there was a significant correlation between the change in the d-ROMs value and the change in the ADHD-RS score. (r = 0.44, p = 0.004), but not in the 4–6 years group

Full size image

Discussion

The reported male-to-female ratio in childhood ADHD varies in the range of 2:1 to 10:1 [15, 16] and that of childhood ASD is 4:1 [17, 18]. About 80% of the subjects in the present study were males. A previous epidemiological study also reported a higher prevalence of developmental disorders in males [19]. Although the impact of gender differences is an important factor to consider, Nagata et al. [20] reported that there are no gender differences in the d-ROMs or BAP. We have also confirmed the absence of any gender differences in these parameters in our previous studies [13]. In addition, in our previous study, the d-ROMs level was significantly higher in group A (3 to 6 years old) than in group B (7 to 11 years old) or group C (12 to 15 years old) (A vs. B: p < 0.001, A vs. C: p < 0.001) [13]. And it has been reported that changes in the environment between preschool and school life lead to different levels of stress in children [14]. Similar tendency was also observed in the present study; d-ROMs are higher in preschool children than school-age children with ASD/ADHD. These findings are speculated to be associated with rapid synaptic pruning and regeneration in childhood [21, 22]. In addition, they may also be affected by psychological stress from anxiety and fear, as preschool children have more anxiety and fear of blood collection than school-age children.

ASD is often accompanied by emotional disorders, including anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and phobias due to psychological stress [23]. Therefore, ASD patients are more likely to exhibit problematic behaviors, such as aggressive behaviors, self-harm, tantrums and insomnia [24]. In the present study also, some subjects were on treatment with sodium valproate or ramelteon for these secondary disorders. In addition, enhanced oxidative stress, caused by mitochondrial dysfunction and environmental factors, has been reported to be a factor involved in the brain damage in ASD patients. ASD patients are considered to be in a high oxidative stress state [7, 8]. On the other hand, an imbalance between oxidative and anti-oxidative processes and enhanced oxidative stress have also been reported in ADHD patients [9, 10]. Taken together, ASD/ADHD patients are considered to have high degrees of oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant capacity. This can also be inferred from comparisons with oxidative stress marker data from healthy children obtained in our previous study [13], but we cannot directly compare with results in our previous study and results in the present study. A significant decrease in the d-ROMs and significant increase in the BAP/d-ROMs ratio were observed after treatment in the present study. The PARS-TR and ADHD-RS, used as assessment tools in the present study, are subjective indicators, based on observations. In the present study, the scores on both PARS-TR and ADHD-RS decreased significantly after treatment. These results suggest that, drug therapy-induced behavioral changes and improvement in symptoms have the effect of reducing the psychological stress in daily life, thereby leading to changes in the d-ROMs and BAP/d-ROMs ratio. In addition, in the present study, besides the study subjects being given drug therapy, both the study subjects and their caregivers were also provided with psychological and educational guidance at the time of their hospital visits. Therefore, the possibility that the nursing care guidance provided to the patients and their caregivers may also have contributed to the reduction in the psychological stress in daily life, leading to changes in the d-ROMs and BAP/d-ROMs ratio, cannot be excluded.

Atomoxetine hydrochloride, which was prescribed for 18.0% of the study subjects, has been reported to cause mitochondrial dysfunction when used at high concentrations [25]. Therefore, it is considered highly necessary to assess oxidative stress using objective biomarkers for selecting the appropriate drug dose.

In the present study, significant correlations were observed between the pre- to post-treatment changes in the d-ROMs and the pre- to post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS, suggesting the existence of a correlation between the subjective and objective indicators.

The efficacy and safety have not been established of guanfacine hydrochloride, atomoxetine hydrochloride and methylphenidate hydrochloride in ADHD children aged less than 6 years old, of aripiprazole in ASD children aged less than 6 years old, and of risperidone in ASD children aged less than 5 years old. Therefore, use of these drugs in the respective age groups represents off-label use in Japan. Thus, there is a lack of evidence for drug therapy in preschool children with ASD/ADHD. In the present study, in consideration of the impact of age and stress from the living environment, such as the school, the study subjects were classified into two age groups: preschool children and school-age children. However, there was no pre- to post-treatment change in the score on either PARS-TR or ADHD-RS in the preschool children, which may be attributed to the possible need for use of different cutoff values of the PARS-TR score in preschool and school-age children [26] and also the difficulty in assessing the ADHD-RS score in 4-year-old children because the minimum age eligible for assessment by ADHD-RS is 5 years.

The present study had several limitations. First, since it was impossible to conduct a detailed investigation of the interpersonal relations and living environment of the study subjects, the potential impact of these factors on the study results could not be verified. Secondly, there are many patients in clinical practice who are followed up with only psychological and educational guidance, etc., without drug therapy. It was not possible to collect blood samples from such patients who received only nursing care guidance, and only subjects who received drug treatment were enrolled in the study. Therefore, as a future issue, it is necessary to verify and compare the results between patients receiving drug therapy with nursing care guidance and those receiving nursing care guidance only, in order to demonstrate the usefulness of drug therapy. Thirdly, the sample size was not sufficient. In particular, the number of preschool children was small. Furthermore, many combinations of drugs were used in the study subjects, making it impossible to assess the oxidative stress markers for each drug. Therefore, in the future, it is necessary to examine the impact of each drug on the measured oxidative stress markers and to carry out re-validation in preschool children by further increasing the sample size.

Conclusions

In the present study, the d-ROMs and the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS decreased significantly after drug treatment. In addition, in school-age children with ASD/ADHD, significant correlations were observed between the pre- to post-treatment changes in the d-ROMs and the pre- to post-treatment changes in the scores on the PARS-TR and ADHD-RS. These findings suggest that the serum level of d-ROMs, an oxidative stress marker, may be a useful objective marker to assess effects of drug therapy in school-age children with ASD/ADHD.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

ASD:

Autism spectrum disorder

ADHD:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

d-ROMs:

Reactive oxygen metabolites

BAP:

Biological antioxidant potential

PARS-TR:

Parent-interview autism spectrum disorder rating scales-Text Revision

ADHD-RS:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder- rating scale

DSM-5:

5th version of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

PDD :

Pervasive developmental disorder

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Reiersen AM, Todd RD. Co-occurrence of ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: phenomenology and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8:657–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi G, Petty C, Wozniak J, Henin A, Fried R, Galdo M, Kotarski M, Walls S, Biederman J. The heavy burden of psychiatric comorbidity in youth with autism spectrum disorders: a large comparative study of a psychiatrically referred population. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40:1361–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sikora DM, Vora P, Coury DL, Rosenberg D. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, adaptive functioning, and quality of life in children with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics. 2012;130(Suppl 2):S91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein S, Schwebach AJ. The comorbidity of pervasive developmental disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: results of a retrospective chart review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004;34:329–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon-Lipkin E, Marvin AR, Law JK, Lipkin PH. Anxiety and mood disorder in children with autism Spectrum disorder and ADHD. Pediatrics. 2018;141:e20171377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waligora A, Waligora S, Kozarska M, Damasiewicz-Bodzek A, Gorczyca P, Tyrpien-Golder K. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) - biomarkers of oxidative stress and methylation and transsulfuration cycle. Psychiatr Pol. 2019;53:771–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yenkoyan K, Harutyunyan H, Harutyunyan A. A certain role of SOD/CAT imbalance in pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorders. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;123:85–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karababa IF, Savas SN, Selek S, Cicek E, Cicek EI, Asoglu M, Bayazit H, Kandemir H, Kati M, Ulas T. Homocysteine levels and oxidative stress parameters in patients with adult ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2017;21:487–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Hwang IW, Lim MH, Kwon HJ, Jin HJ. Association of glutathione S-transferases M1, T1 and P1 gene polymorphisms with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder in Korean children. Gene. 2016;586:228–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceylan MF, Sener S, Bayraktar AC, Kavutcu M. Changes in oxidative stress and cellular immunity serum markers in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;66(3):220–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen E, Ruskovska T. Serum biomarkers of (anti) oxidant status for epidemiological studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:27378–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morimoto M, Hashimoto T, Tsuda Y, Kitaoka T, Kyotani S. Evaluation of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in healthy children. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019;82:651–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Outui K, Umemoto M. Assessment of environmental change at the time of school enrollment based on direct observation. Kinki Univ Fac Appl Sociol Departmental Bull Paper.2017;2:1–13.

  15. Gingerich KJ, Turnock P, Litfin JK, Rosen LA. Diversity and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol. 1998;54:415–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevenson JC, Everson PM, Williams DC, Hipskind G, Grimes M, Mahoney ER. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and digit ratios in a college sample. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19:41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fombonne E. Epidemiological surveys of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33:365–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. Autism Lancet. 2014;383(9920):896–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loke H, Harley V, Lee J. Biological factors underlying sex differences in neurological disorders. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;65:139–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagata K, Hasegawa T, Hirokado Y, Kiyama K, Otsuki C. Lifestyle - related diseases and the oxidative stress regulation system. Jpn J Psychosom Med. 2008;48:177–83.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huttenlocher PR, de Courten C, Garey LJ, Van der Loos H. Synaptogenesis in human visual cortex--evidence for synapse elimination during normal development. Neurosci Lett. 1982;33(3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Penzes P, Cahill ME, Jones KA, VanLeeuwen JE, Woolfrey KM. Dendritic spine pathology in neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(3):285–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Simonoff E, Pickles A, Charman T, Chandler S, Loucas T, Baird G. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism Spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:921–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho BPV, Stephenson J, Carter M. Anger in children with autism spectrum disorder: Parent’s perspective. Int J Spec Educ. 2012;27:14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corona JC, Carreon-Trujillo S, Gonzalez-Perez R, Gomez-Bautista D, Vazquez-Gonzalez D, Salazar-Garcia M. Atomoxetine produces oxidative stress and alters mitochondrial function in human neuron-like cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsujii M, Yukihiro T, Adachi J, Ichikawa H, Inoue M, Uchiyama T. Reliability and validity of the infant part of the PARS. Jpn J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;35:1119–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the subjects of this study for providing the blood specimens. We also wish to express our sincere appreciation to the nurses and clinical laboratory technicians for their efforts in collecting and managing the blood specimens.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tokushima Bunri University, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nishihamahouji, Yamashiro-cho, Tokushima-shi, Tokushima, 770-8514, Japan

    Taisuke Kitaoka & Shojiro Kyotani

  2. Department of pharmacy, Japanese Red Cross Tokushima Hinomine Rehabilitation Center for People with Disabilities, Shinbiraki, Chuden-cho, Komathushima-shi, Tokushima, 773-0014, Japan

    Masahito Morimoto

  3. Department of pediatrics, Japanese Red Cross Tokushima Hinomine Rehabilitation Center for People with Disabilities, Shinbiraki, Chuden-cho, Komathushima-shi, Tokushima, 773-0014, Japan

    Toshiaki Hashimoto, Yoshimi Tsuda & Tadanori Nakatsu

Authors
  1. Taisuke Kitaoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masahito Morimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Toshiaki Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshimi Tsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tadanori Nakatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shojiro Kyotani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TK, MM and TH designed the study. MM, TH, YT and TN collected the data. TK analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. TN and SK supervised the study. MM, TH and SK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taisuke Kitaoka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Along with the purpose and nature of the study, the following matters were explained in writing to each study subject and his/her family members: that no individual will be identified by any third parties throughout the period of the study, and that they can refuse participation in the study without any penalty or loss of benefits, because participation in the study would be purely voluntary. For study subjects incapable of giving consent, consent was obtained from the closest family members. For study subjects capable of giving consent, consent was obtained in writing from both the subject and his/her closest family member. The study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Japanese Red Cross Tokushima Hinomine Rehabilitation Center for People with Disabilities.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitaoka, T., Morimoto, M., Hashimoto, T. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of drug treatment based on measurement of the oxidative stress, using reactive oxygen metabolites and biological antioxidant potential, in children with autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Pharm Health Care Sci 6, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00164-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00164-w

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences

ISSN: 2055-0294

Contact us