Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Opioid therapy duration before naldemedine treatment is a significant independent risk of diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences volume 7, Article number: 3 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The most common adverse event (AE) associated with opioid analgesics is opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Naldemedine (NAL) is widely used for the treatment of OIC. However, diarrhea has been reported as the most common treatment-emergent AE of NAL, and little is known about the risk factors associated with the development of diarrhea during NAL administration. This study examined the risk factors for NAL-induced diarrhea via a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients.

Methods

The data of 101 hospitalized adult patients who received NAL for the first time for the treatment of OIC at Mie University Hospital between June 2017 and December 2018 were extracted from electronic medical records. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 of the 101 patients were enrolled in this study. Diarrhea was defined as “diarrhea” on the medical record within 2 weeks of NAL administration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for the development of diarrhea in patients receiving NAL.

Results

Twenty-two of the 70 patients enrolled (31%) developed diarrhea within 2 weeks of NAL administration. The median duration (range) of NAL treatment before diarrhea onset was 3 (1–12) days. Patients with diarrhea had a significantly longer duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration than patients without diarrhea (P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the independent risk factors for the development of NAL-induced diarrhea were NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy (odds ratio [OR]=7.539; P=0.016) and pancreatic cancer (OR=6.217; P=0.025). In fact, the incidence of diarrhea in patients who were administered NAL within a day of opioid therapy was significantly lower than that in patients who were administered NAL after more than 17 days of opioid therapy (13% vs. 54%, P=0.030).

Conclusions

These results suggested that a prolonged duration of opioid therapy prior to NAL initiation is associated with increased incidence of diarrhea.

Background

The most common adverse event (AE) associated with opioid analgesics include opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The incidence of OIC has been reported in approximately 40–90% of patients treated with the opioids for pain for over a long period [1, 2]. Generally, the administration of laxatives, fiber intake, and exercise therapy are first applied to OIC, however, they do not have sufficient effects in many cases [3,4,5].

Naldemedine (NAL) is a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) that is widely used for OIC treatment [6,7,8,9,10]. PAMORAs are effective in patients with laxative-resistant OIC and their large side chains helps them attain bulky molecular sizes. Therefore, they can avoid the infiltration of the blood-brain barrier at therapeutic doses, resulting in the maintenance of the central analgesic effects of opioids [11].

In a phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial of NAL, the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements per week in patients receiving NAL was significantly higher compared with that in patients receiving placebo [6]. However, gastrointestinal disorders are the most common treatment-emergent AEs of NAL. The AE that was most commonly associated with NAL use was diarrhea (20%), and NAL administration was discontinued in 5% of patients with diarrhea [6]. Moreover, the meta-analysis demonstrated that NAL and lubiprostone were associated with an increased risk of AE in comparison with other laxatives [8]. Thus, the prediction of diarrhea associated with NAL could contribute to the effective use of NAL with less treatment discontinuation. However, little is known about the risk factors of NAL-induced diarrhea.

The US package insert (Symproic®) mentioned that patients administered opioids for less than 4 weeks may be less responsive to NAL based on two randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials. In these trials, non-cancer patients received stable opioids for at least 4 weeks [12]. Other phase IIb and phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials of NAL, including cancer patients with OIC, also restricted enrolled patients to opioids for more than 2 weeks [6, 13]. These evidences indicate that there is room for consideration in the efficacy and safety of NAL in patients who had a short duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration.

In the present study, the risk factors for NAL-associated diarrhea were examined via a retrospective chart review of the hospitalized patients who received NAL without restriction of long-term opioid use.

Methods

Patients selection

This retrospective study included hospitalized patients (> 20 years old) who received NAL (Symproic® tablets 0.2 mg, SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.) for the first time for the treatment of OIC in Mie University Hospital between June 2017 and December 2018. Patients were excluded if they had missing data, colostomy, stool extraction, and NAL dosing period of less than 3 days.

Evaluation of diarrhea

Diarrhea was defined as ‘diarrhea’ on the medical record within 2 weeks after initiation of NAL administration. In a previous randomized controlled trial, this threshold was referred to as the survey period of diarrhea [6]. The severity of diarrhea was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE). Patients’ data were excluded from the evaluation of severity of diarrhea if patients had no data regarding the frequency of stools within 3 days before the start of NAL administration (n=5).

Data collection for eligible patients

Patient characteristics were extracted from clinical records: age, sex, body weight, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), creatinine clearance calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation, NAL dose, use of opioid analgesics, opioid dose, duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration, and co-administrated drugs (risk drugs for constipation, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2-blocker, laxative, anticancer drug, antimicrobial agent), and tubal feeding during NAL administration. The value of serum creatinine < 0.6 mg/dL was substituted for serum creatinine = 0.6 mg/dL [14]. The drugs listed as the cause of constipation in the Clinical Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Cancer Patients, which was edited by the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine, were defined as the risk drugs for constipation: scopolamine hydrobromide, phenothiazine antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants, anti-Parkinson’s drugs, antacids, diuretics, anticonvulsants, iron, antihypertensive drugs, and anticancer drugs. Morphine-equivalent doses were calculated using established methods (oral morphine 30 mg = intravenous (IV) morphine 15 mg = oral oxycodone 20 mg = IV oxycodone 15 mg = fentanyl 0.3 mg = oral hydromorphone 6 mg = oral tramadol 150 mg and oral methadone 45 mg = oral morphine 450 mg) in ethical drug package insert established by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency and the Clinical Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Cancer Patients which was edited by the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine.

Statistical analyses

Statistical comparisons between two groups in the presence and absence of diarrhea were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The multivariate logistic regression model was adjusted for the following potentially confounding factors for the development of diarrhea, which were detected as P < 0.20 in the univariate analyses (female, PS, opioid dose, NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy, co-administration of PPI or H2-blocker, fentanyl, and pancreatic cancer), using the forced entry method. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 26.0 (Armonk, NY, USA). Significance was established at a P value < 0.05. Cutoff values of duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration were determined by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve method with JMP® version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

The flow chart of patient selection is shown in Fig. 1. Total of 101 hospitalized patients were screened, and 31 patients who had missing data (n=3), colostomy (n=3), stool extraction (n=6), and NAL dosing period of less than 3 days (n=19) were excluded from the study patients. Nineteen patients who had NAL dosing period of less than 3 days were excluded for the following reasons: hospital stay of less than 2 days (10 cases), discontinuation of opioid (3 cases), defecation without oral administration (3 cases), discontinuation due to peristaltic pain after NAL administration (1 case), use only for one time (1 case), and oral administration not possible (1 case). After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 patients were enrolled in the present study. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 67 (range, 30–85) years, and 30 patients (43%) were female. The duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration (day [range]) in patients with diarrhea was significantly longer than that in patients without diarrhea (27 [0–1365] vs. 4 [0–268], P=0.002). In contrast, there were no significant differences in other characteristics between patients with and without diarrhea. In 60 eligible patients, excluding the patients who could not be evaluated bowel movements before NAL administration (n=10), significant differences regarding bowel movements during 7 days before NAL administration were not observed between the patients with and without diarrhea (n=16 [89%] vs n=35 [83%], P=0.710).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patient selection

Full size image
Table 1 Patient Characteristics
Full size table

Occurrence rate and severity of diarrhea

The number of patients developing diarrhea, the duration of NAL treatment before diarrhea and severity of diarrhea are summarized in Table 2. Within 2 weeks after the start of NAL administration, 22 patients (31%) developed diarrhea. The median duration of NAL administration before diarrhea [range] was 3 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] days. Additionally, patients who had no data regarding the frequency of stools within 3 days before NAL administration were excluded (n=5), and we evaluated the severity of diarrhea in 17 patients receiving NAL. Grades 1 and 2 diarrheas were observed in 13 patients (76%) and 4 patients (24%), respectively, while grades 3 and 4 were not observed.

Table 2 Incidence of diarrhea, duration of naldemedine treatment before diarrhea and severity of diarrhea in patients receiving NAL
Full size table

Risk factors for the development of diarrhea

Although we investigated correlation between variables (female, PS, opioid dose, NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy, co-administration of PPI or H2-blocker, fentanyl, and pancreatic cancer), strong correlations were not observed (correlation coefficient: | r | ≤ 0.524). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the risk factors for the development of diarrhea in patients receiving NAL (Table 3). The cutoff value (area under the ROC curve, AUC) for the duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration was 17 days (0.73). The sensitivity and specificity were 64 and 77%, respectively. As shown in Table 3, multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for diarrhea were NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy (odds ratio [OR]=7.539; P=0.016) and pancreatic cancer (OR=6.217; P=0.025). Moreover, these significant variables were also detected as independent risk factors in the multivariate analyses using forward and backward stepwise selection methods.

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors of diarrhea in patients receiving naldemedine
Full size table

Relationship between the incidence of diarrhea and duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration

The relationship between the incidence of diarrhea and duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration is shown in Fig. 2. The incidence of diarrhea in patients who started receiving NAL within 0–1, 2–7, 8–17, and > 17 days of opioid therapy was 13, 27, 29, and 54%, respectively. The incidence of diarrhea in patients who started receiving NAL within 1 day of opioid therapy was significantly lower than that in patients who started after more than 17 days (P=0.030). Prolonged opioid therapy before NAL administration tended to increase the incidence of diarrhea.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship between the duration of opioid therapy before naldemedine administration and the incidence of diarrhea

Full size image

Discussion

Little is known about the effect of the duration of opioid therapy on NAL-induced diarrhea. This study demonstrated that a prolonged duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration increased the risk of diarrhea in patients who received NAL. Moreover, multivariate analysis indicated that NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy and pancreatic cancer were significant independent risks factors for NAL-induced diarrhea.

In previous randomized controlled trials, patients who started NAL treatment after 2 weeks or more of opioid therapy were enrolled [6, 13]. In the present study, the duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration in enrolled patients was 0 to 1365 days (Table 1), and 45 patients underwent opioid therapy for less than 2 weeks before NAL administration. In contrast, one of the aforementioned previous randomized controlled study focused on a patient population with lung (43%), breast (23%), colorectal (3%), and other cancers (31%) [6]. As shown in Table 1, we analyzed patients with various cancer types, including pancreatic cancer (17%), head and neck cancer (11%), lung cancer (9%), breast cancer (7%), and soft tissue tumor (7%). Owing to differences in the duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration and in cancer types between our study and the above previous randomized control trials, it was conceived that we could evaluate the unexamined risk factors for diarrhea associated with NAL in the present study.

As shown in Fig. 2, the incidence of diarrhea in patients starting NAL administration within a day of opioid therapy was significantly lower than in patients starting it after more than 17 days (13% vs. 54%, P=0.03). A previous study reported that the incidences of diarrhea in patients who started NAL treatment within 3 days and more than 3 days of opioid therapy were 4 and 22%, respectively [15]. Another study reported that the incidence of diarrhea (40%) significantly increased in patients who started NAL treatment after more than 7 days of opioid therapy [16]. As our results and previous study results indicate that prolonged duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration affects the incidence of NAL-induced diarrhea. On the other hand, there is a difference in the cutoff value of duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration between studies. In previous studies [15, 16], the cutoff values for duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration were not clearly mentioned. By contrast, we statistically calculated the cutoff value by ROC curve method. Therefore, our estimated cutoff value should be more reliable than those in previous studies.

As shown in Table 3, multivariate analysis revealed that pancreatic cancer is also a risk factor for diarrhea in patients receiving NAL. Diarrhea often develops due to pathological conditions, surgical complications and/or decreased secretion of pancreatic enzymes, in patients with pancreatic cancer [17, 18]. As shown in Supplementary Table 1, the number of pancreatic cancer patients who received chemotherapy with and without diarrhea were 4 cases (Gemcitabine (GEM) plus S− 1 [2cases], S-1 [2cases]) and 3 cases (GEM, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus GEM, FOLFIRINOX), respectively. In previous studies, the incidence of diarrhea in S-1 plus GEM is significantly higher than that in GEM alone [19] and Todaka et al. [20] reported that S-1 administration is reported to be a risk of diarrhea. The incidence of diarrhea in FOLFIRINOX is also reported to be significantly higher than that in GEM alone [21]. However, in our study, only one patient underwent FOLFIRINOX regimen, and the patient did not develop diarrhea during the study period. Additionally, the proportion of pancreatic cancer patients in our study was higher than that in the previous study, and as a result, the incidence of diarrhea in our study (31%) was higher than that in the previous report (20%) [6]. However, the number of eligible patients was small to prove the involvement of NAL administration in the development of diarrhea in the patients with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, further study will be needed to reveal the implication of pancreatic cancer on the development of NAL-induced diarrhea.

Opioid dose (morphine base, mg [range]) in patients more than 17 days of opioid therapy was significantly higher than in patients who started receiving NAL ≤17 days of opioid therapy (52.5 [15–390] vs 15 [2.5–45], P< 0.001). Although it is considered that opioid dose increases as opioid therapy prolonged, opioid dose was not extracted as an independent risk factor for NAL-induced diarrhea in the multivariate analysis (Table 3). Therefore, the opioid dose could not significantly affect the development of diarrhea after NAL administration.

Laxatives and tubal feedings may affect the incidence of diarrhea depending on their initiation timing. In the present study, there were no significant differences in the number of patients who started laxatives after NAL administration between the patients with and without diarrhea (3 [13%] vs 5 [10%], P=0.700). Only one patient had started tubal feeding during the study period, and diarrhea was not observed. Thus, we speculated that these factors could have little influence on the development of diarrhea.

Diarrhea is an opioid withdrawal syndrome occurring after sudden reduction or discontinuation of opioids [22]. The severity and duration of withdrawal syndromes widely differ according to the type, dose, and duration of opioid administered [23]. A previous study reported that the degree of withdrawal symptoms such as diarrhea by an opioid antagonist, naloxone, was correlated to the treatment period of morphine in rats [24]. The binding of opioids to μ-opioid receptors located on the submucous and myenteric neurons of the intestinal tract induces physiological changes such as impaired gut motility and decreased fluid secretion, leading to OIC [3, 7, 10]. As NAL is a large molecule, its side chains avoid infiltration into the blood-brain barrier, and its bulky structure having a morphinan skeleton selectively inhibits peripheral μ-opioid receptors. It is anticipated that a limited opioid withdrawal response inside the intestinal tract could result from this inhibition by NAL administration. In phase III clinical trials, a significant difference in the clinical opioid withdrawal scale (COWS) was not observed in patients receiving or not receiving NAL [6, 9]. Although COWS is a rating scale evaluating both central and peripheral withdrawal symptoms, it is mainly intended for central withdrawal symptoms. While peripheral withdrawal symptoms were not evaluated in the present study, diarrhea associated with opioid withdrawal syndrome might result from the inhibition of peripheral μ-opioid receptors by NAL.

Clinical guidelines related to OIC, which were published by the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the European Association for Palliative Care, and the American Gastroenterological Association, recommend traditional laxative therapy (osmotic laxatives and stimulant laxatives) as first-line agents [7, 25, 26]. Based on the current evidence, the traditional laxative therapy has an established efficacy as well as safety and cost benefits, and PAMORAs such as NAL are the recommended second-line agents. Therefore, switching to NAL can be considered when the effect of traditional laxative therapy is insufficient.

The present study has some limitations that must be considered. First, this was a retrospective study conducted in a single facility based on medical records. Particularly, since we evaluated the development of diarrhea based on electronic medical records described by physicians and nurses, the possibility of missing information and nonuniformity in evaluator’s skills cannot be ruled out. Evaluations of diarrhea by the patients also inevitably depended on their subjectivity. Second, opioid withdrawal syndromes other than diarrhea have not been evaluated. Finally, it was difficult to exclude the potential effects of other unknown confounders in our retrospective study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study suggested that NAL administration after more than 17 days of opioid therapy is a significant independent risk factor for NAL-induced diarrhea. Therefore, a prolonged duration of opioid therapy before NAL administration could certainly be involved in the increase of NAL-induced diarrhea.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

AEs:

Adverse events

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

COWS:

Clinical opioid withdrawal scale

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

GEM:

Gemcitabine

IV:

Intravenous

NAL:

Naldemedine

OIC:

Opioid-induced constipation

OR:

Odds ratio

PAMORAs:

Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists

PPI:

Proton-pump inhibitor

PS:

Performance status

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

References

  1. Omer A, Quigley EMM. An update on prucalopride in the treatment of chronic constipation. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2017;10:877–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Müller-Lissner S, Bassotti G, Coffin B, Drewes AM, Breivik H, Eisenberg E, et al. Opioid-induced constipation and bowel dysfunction: A clinical guideline. Pain Med. 2017;18:1837–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Viscusi ER. Clinical overview and considerations for the Management of Opioid-induced Constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2019;35:174–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emmanuel A, Johnson M, McSkimming P, Dickerson S. Laxatives do not improve symptoms of opioid-induced constipation: results of a patient survey. Pain Med. 2017;18:1932–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibuka H, Ishihara M, Suzuki A, Kagaya H, Shimizu M, Kinosada Y, et al. Antacid attenuates the laxative action of magnesia in cancer patients receiving opioid analgesic. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016;68:1214–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Katakami N, Harada T, Murata T, Shinozaki K, Tsutsumi M, Yokota T, et al. Randomized phase III and extension studies of Naldemedine in patients with opioid-induced constipation and Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3859–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pergolizzi JV Jr, Raffa RB, Pappagallo M, Fleischer C, Pergolizzi J 3rd, Zampogna G, et al. Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists as treatment options for constipation in noncancer pain patients on chronic opioid therapy. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:107–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Drugs for treating opioid-induced constipation: a mixed treatment comparison network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2018;55:468–79 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osaka I, Ishiki H, Yokota T, Tada Y, Sato H, Okamoto M, et al. Safety and efficacy of naldemedine in cancer patients with opioid-induced constipation: a pooled, subgroup analysis of two randomised controlled studies. ESMO Open. 2019;4:e000527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saito Y, Yokota T, Arai M, Tada Y, Sumitani M. Naldemedine in Japanese patients with opioid-induced constipation and chronic noncancer pain: open-label phase III studies. J Pain Res. 2019;12:127–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukumura K, Yokota T, Baba Y, Arjona Ferreira JC. Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Naldemedine in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018;7:474–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hale M, Wild J, Reddy J, Yamada T, Arjona Ferreira JC. Naldemedine versus placebo for opioid-induced constipation (COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2): two multicentre, phase 3, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trials. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:555–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster LR, Yamada T, Arjona Ferreira JC. A phase 2b, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain. Pain Med. 2017;18:2350–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirata S, Shibata A, Miyamura S, Kadowaki D. Theory and practice of accurately assessing the renal function of individual patients. Japan J Nephrol Pharmacother. 2016;5:3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takagi Y, Osawa G, Kato Y, Ikezawa E, Kobayashi C, Aruga E. Prevention and management of diarrhea associated with naldemedine among patients receiving opioids: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hashizume J, Ryu E, Nose S, Miyanaga K, Kishikawa R, Nakamura T, et al. Predictors for diarrhea after Administration of Naldemedine: analysis focusing on the administration period of opioid analgesics before the start of Naldemedine. Palliative Care Res. 2020;15:101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mossner J, Keim V. Pancreatic enzyme therapy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;108:578–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moffat GT, Epstein AS, O'Reilly EM. Pancreatic cancer-a disease in need: optimizing and integrating supportive care. Cancer. 2019;125:3927–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Huang QK, Hong WD, Wu JM, Sun XC. The addition of S-1 to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy improves survival with increased toxicity for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: combined meta-analysis of efficacy and safety profile. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39:254–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Todaka A, Fukutomi A, Boku N, Onozawa Y, Hironaka S, Yasui H, et al. S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:567–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Afzali S, Pooya A. Withdrawal syndrome caused by naltrexone in opioid abusers. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33:561–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Volkow ND, McLellan AT. Opioid abuse in chronic pain--misconceptions and mitigation strategies. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1253–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki T, Shimada M, Yoshii T, Uesugi J, Yanaura S. Development of physical dependence on and tolerance to morphine in rats treated with morphine-admixed food. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1983;7:63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, Bennett MI, Brunelli C, Cherny N, et al. Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e58–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crockett SD, Greer KB, Heidelbaugh JJ, Falck-Ytter Y, Hanson BJ, Sultan S, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the medical management of opioid-induced constipation. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Scientists [Grant 19H00397] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

    Akiharu Okamoto, Eri Mizutani & Takuya Iwamoto

  2. Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan

    Akiharu Okamoto & Takuya Iwamoto

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Osaka University Hospital, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

    Kenji Ikemura & Masahiro Okuda

Authors
  1. Akiharu Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenji Ikemura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eri Mizutani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takuya Iwamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masahiro Okuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. AO and EM were involved in data collection. AO, KI, TI, and MO were involved in data analysis and interpretation and drafting of the manuscript. KI, TI, and MO critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Iwamoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinical Research Ethics Review Committee of Mie University Hospital (No. H2018–072). Informed consent was obtained via opt-out through the website.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Comparison of chemotherapy regimen in the pancreatic cancer patients with and without diarrhea.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, A., Ikemura, K., Mizutani, E. et al. Opioid therapy duration before naldemedine treatment is a significant independent risk of diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study. J Pharm Health Care Sci 7, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00187-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00187-3

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences

ISSN: 2055-0294

Contact us